PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

General discussion of the Project Reality Vietnam modification.
Gunner_downer
Posts: 74
Joined: 2008-05-01 02:46

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Gunner_downer »

I do support PRVs incorperation into PR, to keep the community together, but I will not be looking forward to the large download size.
Image
Cassius
Posts: 3958
Joined: 2008-04-14 17:37

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Cassius »

I hope it will be incorporated into the main build, so servers can switch between the 2 versions simply by changing maps. Most modern connections can stomach to download 4 gigs or more. If it takes you like a couple of hours, well you really cant wait 2-6 hours to play the mod, after you waited months and weeks for the update ? Really ?
flyboy_fx
Posts: 118
Joined: 2009-09-02 16:12

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by flyboy_fx »

DL is usually the worst! I may have to delete BF2 to make room for PR and PRV.. :lol: lol jk

But yea aslong as I get a DL site up when released im fine 8-)
TeLe
Posts: 19
Joined: 2009-02-08 22:27

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by TeLe »

I might convert to strictly PR:V. I loved BF:V but i lost my disks :/
Exec
Posts: 295
Joined: 2008-01-10 19:51

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Exec »

flyboy_fx wrote:DL is usually the worst! I may have to delete BF2 to make room for PR and PRV..
Delete the "C:/WINDOWS" folder, you don't need it! :lol:
Image
Image
ma21212
Posts: 2551
Joined: 2007-11-17 01:12

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by ma21212 »

I would say add it into the normal PR:bf2 cuz it would mean more players.
Image
Image
flyboy_fx
Posts: 118
Joined: 2009-09-02 16:12

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by flyboy_fx »

[R-CON]Exec wrote:Delete the "C:/WINDOWS" folder, you don't need it! :lol:
WOOT!
WTF IS INTERNAL SYSTEM ERROR! HELP ME BEFORE IT IS TO LA.....lol jk :lol:


On topic..

Now.. What kinda loading music do we get? I chose real classic. vietnam era songs.. what do ya say? IS that what we will be getting?
jozi02
Posts: 260
Joined: 2008-02-17 20:32

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by jozi02 »

Teek
Posts: 3162
Joined: 2006-12-23 02:45

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Teek »

jozi02 wrote:Operation Irving :)
PR:V Game Footage - Xfire Video
ooh, a Chickasaw, I kinda dislike that aircraft, but I cant wait to be a gunner in one!

"Get some! yeah, get some!
:firing: "
Image
supahpingi
Posts: 1921
Joined: 2007-05-29 14:10

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by supahpingi »

Its a H-34 choctaw actually
BroCop
Posts: 4155
Joined: 2008-03-08 12:28

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by BroCop »

ma21212 wrote:I would say add it into the normal PR:bf2 cuz it would mean more players.
I would say dont add it into the normal PR:BF2 cause it would mean less players.

No offense TrahnLee but I doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam and DL a huge *** file (i believe the downloading will pretty much turn down most of the people)
AfterDune
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17093
Joined: 2007-02-08 07:19

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by AfterDune »

We're still discussing it.

However, the argument of "i doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam" doesn't hold, as people also have their preferences within PR, for example not liking Insurgency, or play as Brits, etc.

But as said, we're still discussing it. Personally, I don't mind, I'll play PR:V one way or another :p .
Image
BroCop
Posts: 4155
Joined: 2008-03-08 12:28

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by BroCop »

[R-DEV]AfterDune wrote:
However, the argument of "i doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam" doesn't hold, as people also have their preferences within PR, for example not liking Insurgency, or play as Brits, etc.
Wasnt really an argument it was more an expression of opinion :p (and as we all know opinion cant be valid/invalid, however it can be ignored :p )
Wakain
Posts: 1159
Joined: 2009-11-23 21:58

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Wakain »

CroCop wrote:I would say dont add it into the normal PR:BF2 cause it would mean less players.

No offense TrahnLee but I doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam and DL a huge *** file (i believe the downloading will pretty much turn down most of the people)
I don't think it would mean a different download for PR:V if it would be incorporated with PR,
and I don't think that many players will switch if they find a vietnam map in the servers map rotation
Snazz
Posts: 1504
Joined: 2009-02-11 08:00

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Snazz »

CroCop wrote:dont add it into the normal PR:BF2 cause it would mean less players. I doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam and DL a huge *** file (i believe the downloading will pretty much turn down most of the people)
I expect 'most people' will happily accept a larger file size for a significant increase in new content and for the sake of keeping the community together.

Tranhlee said if it was incorporated the core PR:V files would only be around 500mb, which seems little to me compared to the total file size of PR. More old maps can also be removed/packed separately if needed to keep down the level file size.
PinkFloyd-
Posts: 48
Joined: 2009-03-22 01:01

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by PinkFloyd- »

I would like it very much, especially for the smaller communities like Australia where we only pull off 1 full server a night, it would be a great shame to have to split that up and have say 40 on PR and 20 on PR:V.
killonsight95
Posts: 2123
Joined: 2009-03-22 13:06

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by killonsight95 »

just make it a game mode so like insurgency it says veitnam or something along those lines. or maybe have different selections on the main menu
Image
Aquiller
Posts: 884
Joined: 2008-03-25 09:43

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Aquiller »

I would say incorporate it into PR main build, but release the 'Nam map pack as a separate object, like "Levels Part 3 - Vietnam' or sth. This would give an opportunity for players that are not "hype'd" about 'Nam to either DL it or not, but will still keep the community together.
Arnoldio
Posts: 4210
Joined: 2008-07-22 15:04

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Arnoldio »

I would really like to have it integrated so only the servers would change the maplists...

Easier for us players too, and you can use this menu allready as it doesnt matter :D
Image


Orgies beat masturbation hands down. - Staker
Tannhauser
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2007-11-22 03:06

Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build

Post by Tannhauser »

Aquiller wrote:I would say incorporate it into PR main build, but release the 'Nam map pack as a separate object, like "Levels Part 3 - Vietnam' or sth. This would give an opportunity for players that are not "hype'd" about 'Nam to either DL it or not, but will still keep the community together.
So when a server like -Cough- TG -Cough- switches to a vietnam map, you suddendly crash out of the server because you lack the map? Mkay... :? :
«Hollywood jackasses who insist on spending seriously huge amounts of money to make films that even my cat won't watch. And he'll happily sit in the bathroom and watch me shit.»
- [R-DEV]Masaq
Locked

Return to “PR:Vietnam General Discussion”