[R-CON]Amok@ndy wrote:have you event downloaded it and tried it ?
as far as I know its the first 4km Insurgency map the taliban have enough vehicles and technicals so the apache wont be a big problem !
No. I cannot download it or play it as I am on vacation in Italy for about 2 more days. That shouldn't matter anyways.
Honestly, all you need is more detail. Everything is too spaced out looking from the screenshots and minimap. I can tell perfectly well just looking at the screenshots that it is bland and uninteresting. Where's the water? Don't tell me mountain people don't drink?
Take Lashkar Valley for example. This map is recognized for it's bright sky and it's forking river. It has many little streams and beautiful green fields. Now look at this map, and describe it to me without telling me the color of the dirt.
The Apache/Tiger(Only IF the German Forces ever come out) will be a big problem, as most of them never get in close to kill insurgents. They will be far out of range up high, using BVR fire with a spotter.
Rudd wrote:It looks like a fantastically well made map from a technical perspective, looks realistic to me, and has plenty of cover to hide under.
if you don't want Afghan maps I suggest you learn how to map yourself and give us maps from a different location.
I for one am looking forward to this, and I'm really interested in seeing how it plays out.
Don't give me that "map it yourself" ****. I know perfectly well that if I do try to map, it would never be played. Nobody would care for it and it would be lost talent.
I never said I didn't want Afghan maps. I want a more interesting Afghan map. Not all of Afghanistan is long fields and high mountains using the typical color of gray and brown.
Take a look at these pictures, and compare:
![Image](http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/8794/screen1034.jpg)
Jormdarreh Range
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/wRami.jpg)
Lashkar Valley
I can already tell which one is more detailed and interesting.