Weapon Suggestions

Suggestions from our community members.
Feroaffer
Posts: 2
Joined: 2011-12-04 17:12

Weapon Suggestions

Post by Feroaffer »

(Sorry this is my 3rd time trying to post this)

I believe you should add the StG 44 a Nazi Germany weapon

Image

The Specs of this weapon are;
550 RPM
7.92x33m bullets
Accurate till 300 meters
30 bullet magazine
Full Auto or Semi-Auto



For the US Army

I believe the BAR should be moved from AR to some other class, and be replaces by the
M1919 Browning 30 Cal

Image

Specs are;
7.62x51mm bullets
500-700 RPM
Accurate till 1100 meters
250 round belt
Full Auto
lucky.BOY
Posts: 1438
Joined: 2010-03-03 13:25

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by lucky.BOY »

I dont know much about this stuff, but wasn't 30 cal used only on tripod, by a 2 man team? IMO that is left for FOB deployables, not for an AR class...

-lucky
H.Maverick
Posts: 716
Joined: 2010-07-03 12:56

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by H.Maverick »

lucky.BOY wrote:I dont know much about this stuff, but wasn't 30 cal used only on tripod, by a 2 man team? IMO that is left for FOB deployables, not for an AR class...

-lucky
as far as i know it could be used on a bipod and only operated by one man also
Its SO evil, it may actually encourage EA to support Modding again - Pantera

Image

Image
Feroaffer
Posts: 2
Joined: 2011-12-04 17:12

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Feroaffer »

Realistically the MG42 would be the exact same, especially with the larger bullet size, which means more recoil.
Pvt.LHeureux
Posts: 4796
Joined: 2009-04-03 15:45

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Pvt.LHeureux »

.30 cal would be good for AR, then the BAR could be in the alternative AR kit.
Image

Chuva_RD : You want to remove bugged thing but dont tell how to fill formed void.
KaizerSosa81
Posts: 207
Joined: 2011-06-23 03:13

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by KaizerSosa81 »

Uh, don't you think the Allies have enough fire power already? Keeping the .30 cal as a HMG deployment and the BAR on the AR kit is just fine.

I'm not fond of the STG 44 suggestion either.

A lot of these suggestions I'm seeing in this section would be good if the mini-mod goes beyond this initial map (which I would hope so) but for now? Just bad ideas.
Pvt.LHeureux
Posts: 4796
Joined: 2009-04-03 15:45

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Pvt.LHeureux »

Well the destructible barbed wire is a good one, the snipers one is kindda useless because snipers are going to be implemented anyway and the .30 would be a good match agains't the German's MG42.
Image

Chuva_RD : You want to remove bugged thing but dont tell how to fill formed void.
Salvo
Posts: 66
Joined: 2011-06-06 07:35

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Salvo »

After serious testing with the US Army AR kit, the BAR is just not adequate for the role. Undeployed, it has a slow rate of fire, deployed, you will go through a 20 round mag in 5 seconds. The AR kit was designed as a suppressive fire weapon, and as such, the BAR does not fulfill this role.
Now, the Browning M1919 .30 cal can be used using a tripod or a bipod, thus using it as a LMG or in the SF (Sustained Fire) role. As the round count for the MG42 is a 100 round box mag, the M1919 is also a 250 round belt link, but could be reduced to just 100 to keep it balanced with the MG42. I mean, the Germans have mounted MG42's along with AR variants, it wouldn't hurt to give the US Army the .30 cal. The BAR has a 20 round mag as I have said previously, which is ridiculous for a AR. You keep reloading every 5 seconds and cannot get that much needed suppressive fire down quick enough.
I am not in favour of removing the BAR, more having it either as an alternative AR, or as a marksman.
As for the STG44; maybe have that as an alternative officer kit?
Second Lieutenant S. Golding
Platoon Commander, 1st Platoon - "Outlaws"
Alpha Company, 1st Battalion
22nd Infantry Regiment, 1st Brigade Combat Team
4th Infantry Division, US Army
Pvt.LHeureux
Posts: 4796
Joined: 2009-04-03 15:45

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Pvt.LHeureux »

Look the BAR will stay AR. A .30 would be cool, if we would have someone to do the animations for it and to model the tripod/bipod + the deploy animations.

The BAR model will be different for next release we hope, because the current one has a problem with it's ironsights.

Forget the STG44, we need a model for this. Could be cool though I agree. Would balance things out a bit.
Image

Chuva_RD : You want to remove bugged thing but dont tell how to fill formed void.
KaizerSosa81
Posts: 207
Joined: 2011-06-23 03:13

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by KaizerSosa81 »

Perhaps the rate of fire on the BAR while deployed can be lower just ever so slightly and advise players to shoot in very controlled bursts so it can be a bit more effective?

U.S. AR users need to stick with their squad so they can maintain a suppressing fire while one reloads because of the deployed rapid fire. If squad leaders wish to detach their AR to a key position I would advised sending a Rifleman to back him up with the current circumstances.

It definitely has the potential to be a great weapon once tweaked a bit.
Capt. J.Smith[26MEU]
Posts: 51
Joined: 2011-11-04 07:49

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Capt. J.Smith[26MEU] »

In my opinion, I think the German STG 44 would be a great alt. Rifleman kit.
O-4 Major J.Smith/ Bn. Commander
6th Force Recon Company
26th Marine Expeditionary Unit
USMC/Project Reality
Verified Veteran OIF-OEF (2003-2009)
US Army
sweedensniiperr
Posts: 2784
Joined: 2009-09-18 10:27

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by sweedensniiperr »

perhaps the stg can be an officers kit?
Image
AfterDune
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17093
Joined: 2007-02-08 07:19

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by AfterDune »

The STG, if we ever get a model, won't be featured as alt rifleman - then too many of them will be available, not gonna happen.
Image
ShavedAlpaca
Posts: 117
Joined: 2010-08-05 23:03

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by ShavedAlpaca »

The stg44 would be seriously OP without massive recoil (g3-ish?)
Image


Friendly fire isn't always that friendly.
Ts4EVER
Posts: 1111
Joined: 2009-02-18 13:43

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Ts4EVER »

Some comments regarding the M1919:

The Americans did not see the machine gun as the center piece of their infantry squad, but as a support weapon. That is why they gave their riflemen more firepower in form of semi-automatic rifles, while the BAR was kept as a relatively crappy "semi-lmg". However, every rifle company had a platoon of M1919 MMGs on tripod that were often directly attached to squads to bolster their firepower. The M1919A6 bipod version was not used in Normandy, it was only introduced near the end of 1944 and only issued on a limited basis.

Mostly test versions of th StG44 were used in Normandy. Units that received these were Paratroopers, some SS divisions like the 12th SS Panzer and some infantry divisions on the cherbourg peninsula. The crappy second line divisions on the beaches would not have them. Later in the war they became increasingly common and a standard weapon, but not in June 1944.
Image
A. Reaper
Posts: 91
Joined: 2011-05-01 02:14

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by A. Reaper »

MG kit- US 30 cal./German MG42

Automatic Riflemen- US BAR/German Fallschirmjagergewehr-42 (FG-42)

Why ^ - Because Both FG42 and BAR use 20 round mags, were issued to paras, and were selective fire. Please?
Pvt.LHeureux
Posts: 4796
Joined: 2009-04-03 15:45

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Pvt.LHeureux »

FG-42 would be very interesting, but it was mainly used by german paras and we would need a model for it sadly.
Image

Chuva_RD : You want to remove bugged thing but dont tell how to fill formed void.
RUSSIAN147
Posts: 109
Joined: 2009-10-17 09:10

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by RUSSIAN147 »

Ts4EVER wrote:Some comments regarding the M1919:

The Americans did not see the machine gun as the center piece of their infantry squad, but as a support weapon. That is why they gave their riflemen more firepower in form of semi-automatic rifles, while the BAR was kept as a relatively crappy "semi-lmg". However, every rifle company had a platoon of M1919 MMGs on tripod that were often directly attached to squads to bolster their firepower. The M1919A6 bipod version was not used in Normandy, it was only introduced near the end of 1944 and only issued on a limited basis.

Mostly test versions of th StG44 were used in Normandy. Units that received these were Paratroopers, some SS divisions like the 12th SS Panzer and some infantry divisions on the cherbourg peninsula. The crappy second line divisions on the beaches would not have them. Later in the war they became increasingly common and a standard weapon, but not in June 1944.
True but officers would still have been present, and maybe a few of them were armed with STG-44's not just the standard MP40. And as for the model of the STG, PR:V has all of EoD's content, and if I'm not mistaken there is an STG-44 in that mod.
"I'd like to see you run faster than my 124gr JHP"
Ts4EVER
Posts: 1111
Joined: 2009-02-18 13:43

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by Ts4EVER »

RUSSIAN147 wrote:True but officers would still have been present, and maybe a few of them were armed with STG-44's not just the standard MP40. And as for the model of the STG, PR:V has all of EoD's content, and if I'm not mistaken there is an STG-44 in that mod.
Of course officers were present, but why would they have an stg44?
Image
BroCop
Posts: 4155
Joined: 2008-03-08 12:28

Re: Weapon Suggestions

Post by BroCop »

Too much CoH apparently.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:WWII Suggestions”