Important BF2:PR:V Question!!
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 17093
- Joined: 2007-02-08 07:19
Re: Important BF2:PR:V Question!!
Thanks for looking guys. Will have a look when I get back from holiday.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/bT6VAdT.png)
-
- Posts: 349
- Joined: 2010-11-27 20:17
Re: Important BF2:PR:V Question!!
Who knows? It's not a big mistake, of course. "Type59" is a licensed copy of T-54A. And, it's difficult to see the difference between them.M42 Zwilling wrote:I know there's a Type 59/T-54 in EOD 2. Strangely, it was named a T-54 in the coding, but its kill message said it was a Type 59.
![Image](http://www.realitymod.com/forum/uploads/signatures/sigpic40807_1.gif)
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/0vNdP.jpg)
-
- Posts: 962
- Joined: 2011-05-31 22:22
Re: Important BF2:PR:V Question!!
If you need to find references to the T-34-85 try your local library, if its big enough you should be able to find books about tanks with pictures and sometimes blue prints. Also the M60 Patton would cool to see in game.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/2SzWd2A.png?1)
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 2012-06-10 11:27
Re: Important BF2:PR:V Question!!
I know there's also an M60 in EOD 2. I still can't say definatively what version it is though.
-
- Posts: 349
- Joined: 2010-11-27 20:17
Re: Important BF2:PR:V Question!!
T-34-85 in Vietnam:
And, of course, T-54 in Vietnam:
I think, that both of them should be in game. Like M60 "Patton" and "Sheridan".
And, of course, T-54 in Vietnam:
I think, that both of them should be in game. Like M60 "Patton" and "Sheridan".
![Image](http://www.realitymod.com/forum/uploads/signatures/sigpic40807_1.gif)
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/0vNdP.jpg)
-
- Posts: 3294
- Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58
Re: Important BF2:PR:V Question!!
If against M48; NVA need T-54.
Otherwise it should be at least two T-34-85 against one M48.
Or does PR make M48 take damage no matter where it is hit?
Otherwise it should be at least two T-34-85 against one M48.
Or does PR make M48 take damage no matter where it is hit?