Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Heavy Death · Post by **Heavy Death** » 2016-06-09 04:56

Oy DEVS. The bodies dissapear after 5 minutes, right? Can that be altered serverside?

Gerfand · Post by **Gerfand** » 2016-06-09 05:10

I dunno about this, but back in BF2, they used to disappear after 15~20 seconds

This may be something on the BF engine w/ the body disappearing when the player go Dead by time, so increasing the Bleed out time may increase the time until the body disappears...

Heavy Death · Post by **Heavy Death** » 2016-06-09 08:18

Tested it with 15 minutes wounded time and the model dissapears after 5, no matter the state. Player can still be revived though.

Post by **UTurista** » 2016-06-09 14:16

If I'm not mistaken you need to alter "ObjectTemplate.timeToLiveAfterDeath 300" in the KIT *.con files, eg: "objects\kits\us\us_at.con".

Where 300 is the time in seconds

Post by **rPoXoTauJIo** » 2016-06-09 16:10

Aswell as in soldiers:

Code: Select all

ObjectTemplate.armor.TimeToStayAsWreck 300

RebbEsc · Post by **RebbEsc** » 2016-06-09 16:58

Any new updates on how 1.4 is going?

Jacksonez__ · Post by **Jacksonez__** » 2016-06-09 18:06

RebbEsc wrote:Any new updates on how 1.4 is going?

no

Simple Definition of no
used to give a negative answer or reply to a question, request, or offer

: in a way that shows a negative response
used to introduce a statement that corrects an earlier statement

Post by **Outlawz7** » 2016-06-09 18:51

RebbEsc wrote:Any new updates on how 1.4 is going?

It's going out the window.

Reamz · Post by **Reamz** » 2016-06-10 15:40

What addition/improvement are the DEVs most excited about in 1.4?

Post by **camo** » 2016-06-10 15:59

Falklands. nuff said.

also all of Outlawz7's reworks/touchups/v2's of current pr maps.

Jacksonez__ · Post by **Jacksonez__** » 2016-06-10 17:28

[R-DEV]camo wrote:Falklands. nuff said.

also all of Outlawz7's reworks/touchups/v2's of current pr maps.

If you think about whole 1.4 update, how big portion Falklands takes? 25%? 50%? 75%?

Post by **Nate.** » 2016-06-10 19:54

It takes about 16km I'd say

Vista · Post by **Vista** » 2016-06-10 20:51

[R-MOD]Nate. wrote:It takes about 16km I'd say

XD 12345

Jacksonez__ · Post by **Jacksonez__** » 2016-06-10 21:38

[R-MOD]Nate. wrote:It takes about 16km I'd say

hehhehhehe.jpeg2000

PricelineNegotiator · Post by **PricelineNegotiator** » 2016-06-11 14:50

Takes a crane.

RAWSwampFox · Post by **RAWSwampFox** » 2016-06-12 14:34

[R-DEV]camo wrote:Falklands. nuff said.

also all of Outlawz7's reworks/touchups/v2's of current pr maps.

Good Morning,

So, will these replace current maps or be provided as an additional option?

Post by **Mineral** » 2016-06-12 14:37

Replaced.

Gerfand · Post by **Gerfand** » 2016-06-12 14:48

Why we need to use the Launcher to change Graphics?

Post by **Mineral** » 2016-06-12 15:13

BF2 allows for lower graphic settings then we'd like. That's why we force graphic settings through PR Launcher to disable the player to set them lower then what we think are the best settings for low graphics without compromising the balance between all the graphic settings

(old BF2 settings allowed you to get rid of lightmaps on statics, grass,...)

solidfire93 · Post by **solidfire93** » 2016-06-13 08:15

so 1.4 going to be launched by the end of 2016 ?

judging by the updates and the amount of Bugs that PR receive every day i say that 1.4 going to be ready by the end of this year...

Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2

Re: Ask the [DEV]s a (?) - Part 2