Why the Merlin is the most under-used helo ever.
-
- Posts: 1527
- Joined: 2006-08-30 22:00
Noone who is sane would deploy a heavy-at kit for PR on the British/USMC side in albasrah.
I don't care how good you are with it (and i say without modesty that i am good with it), you can never guarantee it won't fall into enemy hands. They have absolutley no armour to fire at, nothing that a light-at can't deal with. Sure its good for bunker busting, or clearing out "houses of pain" but its too much of a liability to take into close terrain which you should be doing on that map.
If i was SL or commander i would tell my team never to take heavy-AT. on that map.
Here's hoping for fully implemented massive backblast soon
I don't care how good you are with it (and i say without modesty that i am good with it), you can never guarantee it won't fall into enemy hands. They have absolutley no armour to fire at, nothing that a light-at can't deal with. Sure its good for bunker busting, or clearing out "houses of pain" but its too much of a liability to take into close terrain which you should be doing on that map.
If i was SL or commander i would tell my team never to take heavy-AT. on that map.
Here's hoping for fully implemented massive backblast soon
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: 2007-01-13 13:22
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 17261
- Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59
-
- Posts: 425
- Joined: 2007-04-26 12:57
-
- Posts: 425
- Joined: 2007-04-26 12:57
I disagree, if you have a well secured VC, it's good for defending against any jihad vechicles etc...[R-MOD]Darkpowder wrote:Noone who is sane would deploy a heavy-at kit for PR on the British/USMC side in albasrah.
I don't care how good you are with it (and i say without modesty that i am good with it), you can never guarantee it won't fall into enemy hands. They have absolutley no armour to fire at, nothing that a light-at can't deal with. Sure its good for bunker busting, or clearing out "houses of pain" but its too much of a liability to take into close terrain which you should be doing on that map.
If i was SL or commander i would tell my team never to take heavy-AT. on that map.
Here's hoping for fully implemented massive backblast soon
-
- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 2006-04-30 23:02
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: 2007-08-04 13:03
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: 2007-08-03 06:47
-
- Posts: 2225
- Joined: 2006-04-17 18:21
Blowing the 3 bridges from the palace to the mainland means that the insurgents cant use any of the jihad vehicles from the palace, because the civilians have the same wrench as the crewman kit and cant repair bridges.
But I have seen brits blowing the bridges over the river to the airport to stop jihad vehicles getting to the airport but that will also keeps the warriors from getting to the city and thats just silly.
But I have seen brits blowing the bridges over the river to the airport to stop jihad vehicles getting to the airport but that will also keeps the warriors from getting to the city and thats just silly.
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 10043
- Joined: 2006-09-23 16:29
Nowwww, that's interesting... didn't know they had the crewman wrench.
*NOW* I have a plan for every time I play Brits on that map.
*NOW* I have a plan for every time I play Brits on that map.
"That's how it starts, Mas, with that warm happy feeling inside. Pretty soon you're rocking in the corner, a full grown dog addict, wondering where your next St Bernand is coming from..." - IAJTHOMAS
"Did they say what he's angry about?" asked Annette Mitchell, 77, of the district, stranded after seeing a double feature of "Piranha 3D" and "The Last Exorcism." - Washington Post
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: 2007-06-24 15:56
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: 2007-02-25 15:06
-
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: 2007-08-22 14:47