XHD 2560 x 1600 Screenshots warning: big images

ARMY RANGER · Post by **ARMY RANGER** » 2008-04-26 08:37

Here are my screenshots of me playing project reality on lan thanks to Outlaw22! and pr development team

ARMY RANGER · Post by **ARMY RANGER** » 2008-04-26 08:39

FrameRATE OF 200-100 LOWEST MAXED 16x aa 16x af highest everything
CANT BEAT MY PICTURE! doesnt get any higher muahahaha

$kelet0r · Post by **$kelet0r** » 2008-04-26 09:01

what are you using - a hdtv?

ARMY RANGER · Post by **ARMY RANGER** » 2008-04-26 09:10

no a 30 inch Samsung Syncmaster 305 T ON 2560 X 1600 HDTV cant do XHD res becuase it has max res of 1024 x 1280 san compared to mine 2560 X 1600

jOHNNYdOUBE · Post by **jOHNNYdOUBE** » 2008-04-26 09:40

I went on Vacation to newegg and all I brought back was a lousy 24" Samsung Syncmaster 2493 @ 1920 x 1200 with 99 fps.

PFunk · Post by **PFunk** » 2008-04-26 09:43

What are your specs might I ask, so that I can write them down and beat off staring at them.

ARMY RANGER · Post by **ARMY RANGER** » 2008-04-26 09:52

QX6700 overclocked to 3.5GHZ 1400FSB LIQUID COOLED 30C-55 total mhz ~ 13310 LOAD core temp log
4GB DDR2 1066 CORSAIR 8500C5 ~ UNDERCLOCKED 800 4-4-4-12
2X 8800 GTX OVERCLOCKED 640CORE 1475 SHADERS 2000MEMORY SPEED
RAPTOR X
680I EVGA SLI
30 INCH MONITER 6MS

General_J0k3r · Post by **General_J0k3r** » 2008-04-26 10:07

you, my dear, have either too much money or you are a professional.

where is your rig? i come and nick it

. btw, QX = extreme edition? (i know, im a noob

)

Arrigale · Post by **Arrigale** » 2008-04-26 11:01

That is the most beautiful picture I've ever seen. Hey isn't that me.

ARMY RANGER · Post by **ARMY RANGER** » 2008-04-26 11:06

LOL YEP ME AND YOU

Mora · Post by **Mora** » 2008-04-26 11:25

OMG what do you do for living? Bank robbery's??

=Romagnolo= · Post by **=Romagnolo=** » 2008-04-26 12:36

My monitor was RAPED !

ReaperMAC · Post by **ReaperMAC** » 2008-04-26 16:18

Awesome! How does it fair online?

hall0 · Post by **hall0** » 2008-04-26 16:36

Awesome now i know how good can bf2 looks like

Sabre_tooth_tigger · Post by **Sabre_tooth_tigger** » 2008-04-26 17:09

I think it goes beyond the maximum res Bf2 can provide textures for, dx9 is limited to 2048x2048 but I doubt bf2 caters that high.
Basically there is a depreciating return on image quality, still if you have monitors that large its usefull for spotting distant enemies easily?.

I wouldnt mind one monitor for a full scale map and one for the viewpoint especially when commander, bugs when it stops you walking, etc

Post by **Deadfast** » 2008-04-26 18:52

Threads like this needs to be banned.
Every time I read something like this I fall into a complete frustration as it reminds me how much my PC sucks

Sergeant_Banner · Post by **Sergeant_Banner** » 2008-04-26 19:04

I just think that its a waste for a BF2 based mod ...

You could play BF2 on a 6-core CPU @ 10000Ghz, 500GB RAM 4x 99900GTRSI & an XXXXXXXHD 4096X4096 res monitor and it would still look ****. Not PR's fault, but BF2's.

Now, go do the same with ArmA/Crysis/other graphicly enhanced game, & then we'll see the true power of that beauty =P

Still, i wish i had a 30" monitor

Sarge

DeltaFart · Post by **DeltaFart** » 2008-04-26 22:30

fug man! THats amazing

ARMY RANGER · Post by **ARMY RANGER** » 2008-04-27 03:17

Sabre_tooth_tigger wrote:I think it goes beyond the maximum res Bf2 can provide textures for, dx9 is limited to 2048x2048 but I doubt bf2 caters that high.
Basically there is a depreciating return on image quality, still if you have monitors that large its usefull for spotting distant enemies easily?.

I wouldnt mind one monitor for a full scale map and one for the viewpoint especially when commander, bugs when it stops you walking, etc

this guy know wht hes talkin about its actually higher than bf2 will let you go and yes the engine sucks so it can only look that good no better than there pics