As in bug fixes? Yeah, tons actually. Hopefully we'll fix more problems than we cause this timeHauler wrote: Also will there be fixes for some problems?
![Crazy :crazy:](./images/smilies/imported_crazy.gif)
As in bug fixes? Yeah, tons actually. Hopefully we'll fix more problems than we cause this timeHauler wrote: Also will there be fixes for some problems?
ye but that was only for a test build and we forgot to remove ithx.bjoffe wrote:Hadn't you allready put the USI HMMWV in Kyongan 'Ni some short lapse of time?
Stryker and M4 looks kick ***.
Cool update.
Indeed, under closer examination you are correct![R-DEV]Rhino wrote:the pics you see above with the M4 with a scope ingame are in fact the M4 with ACOG![]()
Good Luck with that.'[=TC= wrote:nuetron;695600']VERY NICE!
But you should have just said a few words with a vague picture like DCon's:
"The SandSotrm is comming"
You should have shown the ARMY logo and a blury soldier running through it saying,
"Project Reality strong"![]()
I like the Army, but I am going to join the Marines, if only the Army had jets.....*sigh* O well.
Is the A-10 still going to be there? Because that would suck to ruin the whole map by taking out the CAS aircraft just because the forces switch..Also, it says Air Force on the pilot helmets.![]()
DC / DCon is based on the gulf war, PR is not, hence why "sandstorm" is appropriate to them and not for us'[=TC= wrote:nuetron;695600']VERY NICE!
But you should have just said a few words with a vague picture like DCon's:
"The SandSotrm is comming"
He was using it as an example[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:DC / DCon is based on the gulf war, PR is not, hence why "sandstorm" is appropriate to them and not for us![]()
Though I do wish he'd put more thought and research in his suggestions.ironcomatose wrote:He was using it as an example![]()
I dont agree with the suggestion because the more info we get the better(Feuerwaffen wrote:Though I do wish he'd put more thought and research in his suggestions.
The M2 Bradley stopped having side firing ports with the M2A2. It now only has two rear firing port weapons which are aimed by tracers.Gunwing wrote:As well as the M1A2 Bradly with side and rear mounted M16A3s for the crew.
Just don't like getting threads of retired airplanes.ironcomatose wrote:I dont agree with the suggestion because the more info we get the better() but i get what he is saying and i dont see anything wrong with it. Its just a different way to advertise. Kinda like the first Batman ads(Why so sad?) without any real info or pics. Thats what he meant.
Good Point, Did google search and saw no Tan/Brown paintironcomatose wrote:I was wondering, whats up with the color of the Stryker? Isnt it supposed to be green?
http://www.mainandcentral.org/home/main ... ats_lg.jpg
http://www.army-technology.com/projects ... yker_6.jpg
http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/file ... z-iraq.jpg