US Army Update Part 1

Project Reality announcements and development highlights.
Locked
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

Well that's good to hear I guess Rhino. :)
Image
Image
Image
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Rabbit »

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:yep, the model was made outside of the mod and there are a few issues with it thou that is down to the MAs didn't really get many WIP pics like they do with our inside models. Most of the issues like pride said are to late to fix, and to small to really worry about.

As for the colour our MAs inform us that in a few years some "tan camo" strykers should start coming out of production, it is a fairly new weapon in the US Army and its still being fully integrated into it.

As for the cage, we will probaly put that on but it caused lots of problems sticking it on the scimitar.
but I have an observation, lets say they do start painting them sand color, what about those levels that are being created that are current time. For example any levels based off this current iraq conflict, they are green, so if you dont have the green for those levels its not really following the realism.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Rhino »

are storyline is based a few years in the future, even Al Basrah is since the brits are in fact no longer in Al Basrah, well they still just are but only providing overwatch. If you want a storyline to it then with the withdrawal of the brit forces from basrah, insurgents groups have taken over the city and the british are tasked to take it back and bring the city and the surrounding area back under control ;)
Image
jayceon515
Posts: 436
Joined: 2007-07-24 14:19

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by jayceon515 »

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:are storyline is based a few years in the future, even Al Basrah is since the brits are in fact no longer in Al Basrah, well they still just are but only providing overwatch. If you want a storyline to it then with the withdrawal of the brit forces from basrah, insurgents groups have taken over the city and the british are tasked to take it back and bring the city and the surrounding area back under control ;)
Since you're saying that this is a few years in the future wouldn't it be more logical for the US Army to retake Basrah instead of UK since they are umm...well...better? :confused:
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Scot »

That is fair... and also who knows who will retake Basrah in the future?? Are you Doctor Who and know what will happen??? And i shall not start any flaming at all to that ridiculous comment.
Image
Technoelite
Posts: 632
Joined: 2007-06-19 16:37

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Technoelite »

u never knwo teh Iraninas could retake basra lol
Image
Image
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Rhino »

jayceon515 wrote:Since you're saying that this is a few years in the future wouldn't it be more logical for the US Army to retake Basrah instead of UK since they are umm...well...better? :confused:
we took Basrah this time why would we not take it again?
Image
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

And Saying the U.S. Army,is Better than the UK...that's just wrong...They took it the first time,they can damn well do it beautifully again,lol. :)
Image
Image
Image
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Scot »

The U.S Army has waay more manpower and waay more money, I dunno who is better.
Image
OkitaMakoto
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9368
Joined: 2006-05-25 20:57

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by OkitaMakoto »

Lets try to keep on topic here guys...

Today's topic is "Media US Army Update Part 1," if anyone forgot with all this debate on which countries mom could kick another countries mom's ***. ;)
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Viper5 »

Everyone keep their E-Peens flaccid and move on now.
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Scot »

mines still a semi....

And just to get on topic, how soon will the update 2 be on???
Image
billdan
Posts: 319
Joined: 2007-04-13 22:58

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by billdan »

nvm
|TG-69th|Mix0lydian in-game
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

Okay,I just wanna mention one more thing,to get what I'm saying clear...

I'm an American,so of course I love the U.S. military..

But I like our U.K. homiez,so I'll never say one is better than the other,cuz i love em' both,lol.

Okay,done. :)

Yea,I'm also wondering when the next Army update will be around?Any estimate?
Image
Image
Image
Gunwing
Posts: 184
Joined: 2007-02-16 18:21

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Gunwing »

Maxfragg wrote: ;-) i would say the USI Bradley is a hot candidate for part 2 of this update
If not the way they have it ingame then at least as part of PR. Though for the driver it better have a burst fire mode, and a single shot mode like the real life one dose. IE 4 shots for burts, 1 click per shot for single it would make it feel more real.

Also it better have the guns on the side and rear for the passangers as well or I won't like it. The M2A3 bradly will rock for sure.

ALso any chance the M1A2SEP will finaly get replaced by PR? I mean the model for it is utter **** that DICE made, and the T-90 should be remodeled as well.

In fact all the vBF2 vehicles should be replaced with more realisitc, and better looking counter parts.
Panzerfire
Posts: 1717
Joined: 2008-03-19 01:37

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Panzerfire »

Gunwing wrote:ALso any chance the M1A2SEP will finaly get replaced by PR? I mean the model for it is utter **** that DICE made, and the T-90 should be remodeled as well.

In fact all the vBF2 vehicles should be replaced with more realisitc, and better looking counter parts.
You realize you're asking for A LOT?

USMCMIDN: KILL EVERYTHING!
gx: KILL! KILL! KILL 'EM ALL!!
[R-DEV]Dunehunter: Great attitude for hearts and minds :p
FLOZi
Posts: 66
Joined: 2008-02-12 14:37

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by FLOZi »

I'm sure they'll all get done in time, but obviously there are other priorities.
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

Yea you are asking for alot...



Yea,The USI mod Abrams,and Bradley are perfect replacements...Because the USMC still use the M1A1...And their Bradley is just,perfect,lol.Though I'm pretty sure the "burst" mode on the bradley is 3 shots,not 4...ALSO,Why don't those M4's have the same ACOG's as the USMC M16's?

BTW,This is turning into an Army suggestion thread..Let's keep it about the feedback of the news update...
Last edited by agentscar on 2008-06-15 00:31, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image
Image
USMC[KILLER]
Posts: 142
Joined: 2005-05-03 01:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by USMC[KILLER] »

USI M1A1 would be perfect for the USMC! :)
Image
100% Polish & Proud

Alpha SquadPvt. Polak Echo Company, 2nd Battalion 7th Marine Regiment
1st Marine Division
USMC
Hauler
Posts: 219
Joined: 2006-10-26 09:21

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Hauler »

Why not just work out an agreement with USI and take their models? They are absolutely fantastic.
"Who just threw a grenade at a tank :? ??: "
Locked

Return to “Announcements & Highlights”