US Army Update Part 1

Project Reality announcements and development highlights.
Locked
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by ReadMenace »

agentscar wrote:Yea you are asking for alot...



Yea,The USI mod Abrams,and Bradley are perfect replacements...Because the USMC still use the M1A1...And their Bradley is just,perfect,lol.Though I'm pretty sure the "burst" mode on the bradley is 3 shots,not 4...ALSO,Why don't those M4's have the same ACOG's as the USMC M16's?

BTW,This is turning into an Army suggestion thread..Let's keep it about the feedback of the news update...
Because the ACOGs used on M4s are different. :wink:

-REad
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

Well,PR has taken the following from USI :

-AH-1 "Littlebird"
-A-10
-SU-25 "Frogfoot"
-Humvee
-Supply trucks
-F-16
-BRDM + variants
-T-62

So I don't see why they don't use their Abrams/Bradley too,lol.This isn't mentioned much I think,leaving USI un-credited in a way,so thought I'd inform some of you...Not trying to target PR though.

:)
Image
Image
Image
greenfire07
Posts: 40
Joined: 2007-07-31 01:24

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by greenfire07 »

agentscar wrote:Well,PR has taken the following from USI :

-AH-1 "Littlebird"
-A-10
-SU-25 "Frogfoot"
-Humvee
-Supply trucks
-F-16
-BRDM + variants
-T-62

So I don't see why they don't use their Abrams/Bradley too,lol.This isn't mentioned much I think,leaving USI un-credited in a way,so thought I'd inform some of you...Not trying to target PR though.

:)
didnt they get those from armored fury and euro force?
Image
All that good must do for evil to succeed, is nothing.
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

No...They don't even near resemble the ones from that...

And anyways,none of that is in any of those expansions packs,except for the A-10,Littlebird,and Frogfoot,which are in Armored Fury...But those are very crappy...

Those are all from U.S. Intervention my friend. :)
Image
Image
Image
greenfire07
Posts: 40
Joined: 2007-07-31 01:24

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by greenfire07 »

i guess your right, i dont have any of them i just guessed.
noting something from earlier, why wont riflemen have full auto m4's? my stepdad is going to Iraq next week, and everyone in the army is issued a full auto m4, with some sort of holographic sight on it. also, the lack of night vision mounts still bugs the **** outta me, dont know why either.
Image
All that good must do for evil to succeed, is nothing.
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

Exactly,I know quite a few grunts in the U.S. Army and Airborne gies,and they all have full auto capable M4's...Some of the grunts I know that've been to Iraq tell me how they used to get chewed out for going full auto pointlessly on targets while in combat.And Airborne gies tell me how they hate it when they hear about/see grunts doing that,lol.
Image
Image
Image
CodeSpartan
Posts: 127
Joined: 2007-01-02 07:22

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by CodeSpartan »

Um... what? The M4 is single shot and burst. There's the M4A1, which can go full auto, but I don't think that's issued to everyone in the army. I have a cousin going into the Army and he only mentioned using burst.
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Jaymz »

greenfire07 wrote:why wont riflemen have full auto m4's? my stepdad is going to Iraq next week, and everyone in the army is issued a full auto m4, with some sort of holographic sight on it. also, the lack of night vision mounts still bugs the **** outta me, dont know why either.
Is your stepdad SF or a Delta Operator? Because they're pretty much the only units issued the M4A1.
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
808-SLUGGO
Posts: 127
Joined: 2007-05-14 20:59

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by 808-SLUGGO »

im pretty sure all M4's issued to the average US army foot soldier aren't modified to fire full auto but only single and burst

(think.. if all M4's were full auto.. the Squad AUTOMATIC Weapon M249 would be pretty irrelevant)

however i think greenberets and other SF can modify their M4 to fire full auto or their just flat out issued the M4A1 on deployment
Image
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by ReadMenace »

808-SLUGGO wrote: (think.. if all M4's were full auto.. the Squad AUTOMATIC Weapon M249 would be pretty irrelevant)
Quick barrel changes :wink:

-REad
Teek
Posts: 3162
Joined: 2006-12-23 02:45

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Teek »

Hauler wrote:Why not just work out an agreement with USI and take their models? They are absolutely fantastic.
we do have a agreement, but it is a trade, you cant take all the models from one mod without giving something back.
Image
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

All the stuff that USI has given to PR...I haven't seen one thing in from PR in USI,except the M14,and Destructable environments...
Image
Image
Image
greenfire07
Posts: 40
Joined: 2007-07-31 01:24

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by greenfire07 »

yes, i talked to him yesterday and he has an m4a1 at home, but not in the army, once again i am wrong. he is an MP
Image
All that good must do for evil to succeed, is nothing.
Ironcomatose
Posts: 3471
Joined: 2007-02-21 06:07

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Ironcomatose »

agentscar wrote:All the stuff that USI has given to PR...I haven't seen one thing in from PR in USI,except the M14,and Destructable environments...
I thought they gave us the M14. PR did give them Ejod desert right?

[R-DEV]DuneHunter - No offense to any female gamers, but never, ever underestimate the amount of havoc a woman can unleash upon innocent unsuspecting electronics.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Rhino »

agentscar wrote:All the stuff that USI has given to PR...I haven't seen one thing in from PR in USI,except the M14,and Destructable environments...
we have gave them loads...

Little bird, maps, help M14 which you could say is also from EOD, game modes, python code, we are there to help each other.
Image
Petey
Posts: 253
Joined: 2007-08-21 22:02

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Petey »

soo is USI and PR like brothers?
btw WHERE IZ UPDATE NUMBUH TWOOO!!!!
Image
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by LtSoucy »

^yes and are parents are BSS. And its coming i'm sure.
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

Yea,lol

BSS parent

USI & PR whiny,spoiled, brats,lol jk.


Yea,You did give them Ejod,but I wasn't sure about the Littlebird...Oh well.

:)
Image
Image
Image
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Viper5 »

EJOD went to USI from PR. The M14 came from EOD. The LBs came from all over. IIRC the original transport is from PR, the 2 armed versions are from elsewhere.
HughJass
Posts: 2599
Joined: 2007-10-14 03:55

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by HughJass »

the only thing that is awesome in usi imo is the abrams, what a beauty.
Image
Locked

Return to “Announcements & Highlights”