Heh, just be glad no one has pulled an Eggman=Romagnolo= wrote:Not even joke with us !
Yet...
Heh, just be glad no one has pulled an Eggman=Romagnolo= wrote:Not even joke with us !
because we dont need a game server, how many times do i have to say itblack-wolf wrote:If you guys need a testserver, why don't you guys just use a local server?
We are not making sir sandwiches soldier!black-wolf wrote:Sire yes sir!
Why exactly hasn't this guy been banned yet?ARMY RANGER wrote:ill stick to arma which has a nice glass crack when hit unlike crpppy bf2
for the lulz [idk]CodeSpartan wrote:Why exactly hasn't this guy been banned yet?
SWEET!!! That'll be loads of fun!BetterDeadThanRed wrote:and to those of you that think the stryker is an going to be too weak against the MEC equivalents, I have one thing to say to you. M2 Bradleys with TOWs. That is all.
I agree. Most of the Army Auto Rifleman I see dont have the standard M249 anymore. Heres some examples I foundBetterDeadThanRed wrote: I understand work priorities, but I figured I should probably point out the SAWs the guys were using were all M249 paras with Elcans, and also had an interesting bipod system that made them very stable when fired from the hip. Not whining with this one, just a gee-wiz thing. (It may be due to the fact they are a mountain division and not a regular infantry division, but I'm not quite sure.)