[Static] New Fields

Threedroogs · Post by **Threedroogs** » 2008-12-19 18:30

nice! looks great.

=Romagnolo= · Post by **=Romagnolo=** » 2008-12-19 20:03

[quote=""'[R-DEV"]Rhino;874660']no it just means there are higher priority stuff I need to be working on.[/quote]

Like..... ?

[quote="NyteMyre""]Looks nice,
Kinda reminds me of those screenshots that Invasion 1944 for Operation Flashpoint usually released. (they had some nice flower/grass fields in their mod aswell)

Example #1, Example #2, Example #3, Example #4.[/quote]

LOL at the Halftrack roll !

Post by **CodeRedFox** » 2008-12-19 20:45

=Romagnolo= wrote:Like..... ?

Making fastrope movies.

Post by **MAINERROR** » 2008-12-19 20:49

[R-DEV]CodeRedFox wrote:Making fastrope movies.

Nah wrong, making fast ropes!

M.Warren · Post by **M.Warren** » 2008-12-19 21:42

[R-COM]Outlawz wrote:Finally no more game play issues with undergrowth fields \o/

I do think that maybe a smaller version of the grass patch would be useful, in those Qwai screenshots you can notice that it's actually a bunch of round grass fields stuck together

Murphy's Law: If it's stupid but it works; it's not stupid.

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:a smaller version would mean you would notice the "honey cone" effect even more. We feel that its a very little thing compared to how many advantages this gives and all in all, gives it colour variation which at most levels looks good, just when your look from high up down looks a little odd but still, fine for the most part.

That's the exact kind of effect we need. Inconsistancies are best suited for grassy areas because we wouldn't want players to stare at the grass and look for a singular means to identify if an enemy soldier is in it. The harder the better.

Concealment and cover is the key to any infantryman. Something that's always been missing from out PR experience for some time. It appears our soldiers will have a chance to perform better now against armored units.

Skodz · Post by **Skodz** » 2008-12-19 22:16

Very nice, I love these long draw distance field. We want more of it.

agentscar · Post by **agentscar** » 2008-12-19 22:19

Looks waaay better than the old ones.Great work as usual Rhino!

evya · Post by **evya** » 2008-12-20 06:56

awesome work! great news about the drawing distance

DeadSmile187 · Post by **DeadSmile187** » 2008-12-20 07:45

[R-CON]MAINERROR wrote:Nah wrong, making fast ropes!

loled on that

GR34 · Post by **GR34** » 2008-12-20 07:56

the popies will add some nice color to the battlefield. I hope they wont turn into Flanders fields.

maverick551 · Post by **maverick551** » 2008-12-20 08:20

simply gorgeous Rhino. Just another reason why PR is its own game

cyberzomby · Post by **cyberzomby** » 2008-12-20 09:08

Looks very realistic! Really great

slayer · Post by **slayer** » 2008-12-20 12:28

cute

hiberNative · Post by **hiberNative** » 2008-12-20 13:34

dude, i appreciate this. a lot. especially if it draws at really long distances.
please spam it everywhere on every map ;P

sn1p3rslippinz · Post by **sn1p3rslippinz** » 2008-12-20 13:39

good job buddy

Claymore · Post by **Claymore** » 2008-12-20 15:41

Oh my god, this is one of the best news ever. Apart from a fact that it looks very good one of the big issues in the game was solved. Bravo!

ExisSellos · Post by **ExisSellos** » 2008-12-20 16:06

awsome o 3000

D4rk_l0rdBR · Post by **D4rk_l0rdBR** » 2008-12-20 16:27

Scot wrote:Excellent work Rhino, bring back Mao Vallay

Yeah and Steel Thunder too!!!

With this nem grass will be great

D4rk_l0rdBR · Post by **D4rk_l0rdBR** » 2008-12-20 16:29

*new

ps: where is the edit button

[Static] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields

Re: [Statcs] New Fields

Re: [Statics] New Fields