Tank armor changes

Project Reality announcements and development highlights.
Locked
solidfire93
Posts: 491
Joined: 2015-06-26 14:21

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by solidfire93 »

so... T-72 going to be shit for next update :(
DzCrow
Posts: 59
Joined: 2016-02-03 19:33

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by DzCrow »

if it mec why not put the saudi M1A2S . if it war against infantry they will get the t70 but if it against other tanks alot of them have t90 and abrams ??
i dont know anything about tanks it only an idea
CURRENT_YEAR
Posts: 14
Joined: 2016-03-09 11:35

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by CURRENT_YEAR »

"18% damage"

User avatar
Mats391
PR:BF2 Lead Developer
Posts: 7636
Joined: 2010-08-06 18:06

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by Mats391 »

CURRENT_YEAR wrote:"18% damage"

That is a hit against top armor and it pretty much looks like 122% damage to me :)
Image

Mineral: TIL that Wire-guided missiles actually use wire
Barbrady
Posts: 121
Joined: 2013-04-03 12:07

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by Barbrady »

bandwevil
Posts: 152
Joined: 2012-06-07 21:09

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by bandwevil »

[R-DEV]Mats391 wrote:That is a hit against top armor and it pretty much looks like 122% damage to me :)
Top-attack ATGMs confirmed for 1.4? :-o :wink:
CURRENT_YEAR
Posts: 14
Joined: 2016-03-09 11:35

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by CURRENT_YEAR »

[R-DEV]Mats391 wrote:That is a hit against top armor and it pretty much looks like 122% damage to me :)
If you had a mechanic that makes the TOW explode when it's above an enemy armor to simulate top-attack, you'd be correct.

If this was PR, the missile would've passed harmlessly over the tank.

Without that mechanic, a front-armor hit (as well as side and rear) in PR should simulate a detonation above the target IRL.

Hence, without implementing any top-attack mechanic, TOWs in PR should one-shot a tank.
PatrickLA_CA
Posts: 2243
Joined: 2009-07-14 09:31

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by PatrickLA_CA »

Does anyone remember or have any documentation about the PR: Combined Arms mini-mod? I'm pretty sure that there was a top attack mode for launchers as well as targeting system for armor. Anyone confirm?
In-game: Cobra-PR
Jacksonez__
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2013-07-28 13:19

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by Jacksonez__ »

CURRENT_YEAR wrote:"18% damage"

*no TNT was used during filming this video
chrisweb89
Posts: 972
Joined: 2008-06-16 05:08

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by chrisweb89 »

PatrickLA_CA wrote:Does anyone remember or have any documentation about the PR: Combined Arms mini-mod? I'm pretty sure that there was a top attack mode for launchers as well as targeting system for armor. Anyone confirm?
It worked by fitting vehicles with laser targets and the missiles being an LT mode basically.
iglotruck
Posts: 190
Joined: 2015-12-14 20:46

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by iglotruck »

chrisweb89 wrote:It worked by fitting vehicles with laser targets and the missiles being an LT mode basically.
Isn't that how the Merkava currently works in game?
X-Alt
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2013-07-02 22:35

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by X-Alt »

Thank you for nerfing HEAT. Shout out to Zwilling. Just give MEC the T-90 for the love of god, the T-72 nerf is long overdue.
Last edited by X-Alt on 2016-03-28 19:46, edited 1 time in total.
solidfire93
Posts: 491
Joined: 2015-06-26 14:21

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by solidfire93 »

X-Alt wrote:Thank you for nerfing HEAT. Shout out to Zwilling. Just give MEC the T-90 for the love of god, the T-72 nerf is long overdue.
that's not a bad idea..
just give them the version that does not have ATGM on it....

Syrian Army T-90A During Battle in northern aleppo, February 2016

Image

T-90A ? Russian army version with welded turret, V-92S2 engine and ESSA thermal viewer. Sometimes called T-90 Vladimir.

correct me if im wrong about this version... regarding ATMG on it..
X-Alt
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2013-07-02 22:35

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by X-Alt »

solidfire93 wrote:that's not a bad idea..
just give them the version that does not have ATGM on it....

Syrian Army T-90A During Battle in northern aleppo, February 2016

Image

T-90A ? Russian army version with welded turret, V-92S2 engine and ESSA thermal viewer. Sometimes called T-90 Vladimir.

correct me if im wrong about this version... regarding ATMG on it..
Probably the old T-90S batches. ATGM doesn't matter since it's nerfed.
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by Rabbit »

solidfire93 wrote:that's not a bad idea..
just give them the version that does not have ATGM on it....

Syrian Army T-90A During Battle in northern aleppo, February 2016

Image

T-90A ? Russian army version with welded turret, V-92S2 engine and ESSA thermal viewer. Sometimes called T-90 Vladimir.

correct me if im wrong about this version... regarding ATMG on it..
Image
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
blayas
Posts: 135
Joined: 2014-04-01 15:17

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by blayas »

It is necessary to point out the small proportion of T-90s being operated by Arabs, in the maps with greater tanks count, this ratio would need to be re-created with loyalts restricting 1 T-90 mixed with other T-72s
Last edited by blayas on 2016-03-30 03:03, edited 1 time in total.
X-Alt
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2013-07-02 22:35

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by X-Alt »

blayas wrote:It is necessary to point out the small proportion of T-90s being operated by Arabs, in the maps with greater tanks count, this ratio would need to be re-created with loyalts restricting 1 T-90 mixed with other T-72s
Nobody cares, the T-72A\M1 just needs to be nerfed into the ground, and added to Grozny. Also makes Sbeneh more immersive without Thermals, and the T-90 can be added to rich Arab MEC without consequence. Nobody cares that nobody operates the BMP-2M, we still have it because it's cool.
Souls Of Mischief
Posts: 2391
Joined: 2008-05-04 00:44

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by Souls Of Mischief »

Rabbit wrote:Image
HHHNNNNNNNNNNNGGG
[img]http://imageshack.us/a/img585/3971/r0mg.jpg[/img]
[F|H]Zackyx
Posts: 297
Joined: 2011-11-18 21:47

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by [F|H]Zackyx »

X-Alt wrote:Nobody cares, the T-72A\M1 just needs to be nerfed into the ground, and added to Grozny. Also makes Sbeneh more immersive without Thermals, and the T-90 can be added to rich Arab MEC without consequence. Nobody cares that nobody operates the BMP-2M, we still have it because it's cool.
BMP-2M is operated by Algeria in huge numbers (1000+) :

1400 BMP-1/2/3

240 BMP-1 Vanilla
760 BMP-1 modernized with the Berezokh turret (BMP-2M)
300 BMP-2 modernized to BMP-2M standard
100 BMP-3

sources :

BMP Upgrades Drive Algerian Modernization

And concerning the T-72 many Arabs country have upgraded their T-72 Syria (TURMS-T), Algeria (T-72M1M)...

For the T-90 syria operate an unknown number and Algeria has 500+.

Those numbers can help the devs to sort out the balance on big maps.
Jacksonez__
Posts: 1090
Joined: 2013-07-28 13:19

Re: Tank armor changes

Post by Jacksonez__ »

X-Alt wrote:Nobody cares, the T-72A\M1 just needs to be nerfed into the ground, and added to Grozny. Also makes Sbeneh more immersive without Thermals, and the T-90 can be added to rich Arab MEC without consequence. Nobody cares that nobody operates the BMP-2M, we still have it because it's cool.
If(/when) the T-72M1 gets nerfed to shit-tier, Militia should get it on some maps ;-) Why not Grozny? I recall seeing one picture from battle of Grozny where militants were driving a captured T-72 and BTR-60(/80).

Militants driving captured BMP-2 in Grozny
Image

Militants operating captured T-72 (I suppose it's T-72?)
Image
Image

Grozny LRG:
T-72
BMP-2
BMP-1

for militia :D
Last edited by Jacksonez__ on 2016-03-31 19:04, edited 6 times in total.
Locked

Return to “Announcements & Highlights”