US Army Update Part 2

Project Reality announcements and development highlights.
Locked
=Romagnolo=
Posts: 4765
Joined: 2006-12-29 14:52

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by =Romagnolo= »

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:no the "_woodland" ie, temperate climate version of the black hawk dose not need the air filters cos in china or other template climates there is no sand to get into the engines so it dont need the air filters...

Behind the engines is the exhaust which was on the vbf2 model...

Ah, that's true, very well observed.
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro."
(yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
LeChuckle
Posts: 664
Joined: 2007-02-09 13:53

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by LeChuckle »

now for some new MEC skins please... they look like they come directly out of a hollywood film
Renegade Warrior
Posts: 153
Joined: 2006-02-26 10:46

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by Renegade Warrior »

Another great update!
.:iGi:. clan website
Image
ImageSmoke going down!
[predaeus]
Posts: 28
Joined: 2007-08-08 17:31

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by [predaeus] »

Bradley yay! Great update!

Will it be able to carry troops?
Would be ok if not, but I like the looks of it dropping them off *g*
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by agentscar »

Well,In real life,and in USI (where it came from) it carries troops in the back,so I'm guessing it will...???...
Image
Image
Image
HughJass
Posts: 2599
Joined: 2007-10-14 03:55

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by HughJass »

LeChuck wrote:now for some new MEC skins please... they look like they come directly out of a hollywood film
good point
Image
Fabryz
Posts: 177
Joined: 2007-05-04 18:30

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by Fabryz »

Does it mean that there will be another part of news like in a common trilogy ( :) ) or that we are really close to v0.8? :D
M_Striker
Posts: 513
Joined: 2008-05-31 00:36

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by M_Striker »

So where are the protective railings on the side of the Stryker??????? :D
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by Jaymz »

Mora wrote:These new things all look great. Also new skin for the Abrams? As seen on the first M2A2 photo?
Most US Vehicles have been reskinned by Shifty :)
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
Ironcomatose
Posts: 3471
Joined: 2007-02-21 06:07

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by Ironcomatose »

[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:Most US Vehicles have been reskinned by Shifty :)
They look to clean IMO.

[R-DEV]DuneHunter - No offense to any female gamers, but never, ever underestimate the amount of havoc a woman can unleash upon innocent unsuspecting electronics.
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by bosco_ »

Some scratches 'n dirt wouldn't hurt.

(yay a rhyme)
Image
ReaperMAC
Posts: 3055
Joined: 2007-02-11 19:16

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by ReaperMAC »

Just let me put a couple rounds into them, that'll make them look less 'neat' :grin:
Image
PR Test Team: [COLOR="Black"]Serious Business[/COLOR]
[R-DEV]dbzao: My head Rhino.... (long pause) My beautiful head
[R-DEV]Rhino - If you want to spam do it in the tester area please.
Control the Media, Control the Mind.
isooth
Posts: 60
Joined: 2008-02-29 12:11

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by isooth »

They need a LOT moar dust, scratches, burns, holes...
Image
IEDmagnet580
Posts: 9
Joined: 2008-06-10 02:50

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by IEDmagnet580 »

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote: 2. we have nothing to replace the miniguns with even if we wanted to.
well most US Black Hawks utilize the M240 MG I believe, and dont you have an m240 on the brit land rover? And i think it would be cool if you get a 240 in the game that you would replace the "mounted" M249s around the map with M240s because I think they would be more likely to be seen as "stationary" meapons than the SAW
gazzthompson
Posts: 8012
Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by gazzthompson »

IEDmagnet580 wrote:well most US Black Hawks utilize the M240 MG I believe, and dont you have an m240 on the brit land rover? And i think it would be cool if you get a 240 in the game that you would replace the "mounted" M249s around the map with M240s because I think they would be more likely to be seen as "stationary" meapons than the SAW
they would need to remodel the hole bh rather than swap the minigun for m240
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by Jaymz »

gazzthompson wrote:they would need to remodel the hole bh rather than swap the minigun for m240
Incorrect, we can change them for anything we want. But we're doing really important things that need our attention.
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
Napoleon_TR
Posts: 303
Joined: 2008-03-18 13:10

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by Napoleon_TR »

Thanks for Black Hawk :)
Katarn
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3358
Joined: 2006-01-18 22:15

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by Katarn »

Paperchase wrote:I hope the new M4s won't have clipping problems that occurs with 99% of the other PR weapons, vanilla and in-house made models.
Not a model problem but an engine problem. But in any case, fixed.
[UKE]Vern
Posts: 54
Joined: 2006-05-29 21:57

Re: US Army Update Part 2

Post by [UKE]Vern »

Looking forward to 0.8
Image
Locked

Return to “Announcements & Highlights”