Project Reality Forums

Please stop hiding suggestions in the Ask a DEV thread. We have a separate process for that and users will be warned only once. Thanks.

Apologies, I wasn't trying to sneak in suggestion into this topic, just got carried out a bit more than usual in discussing about how mortars and artillery should work in PR.

Stopping here.

Anderson29 wrote:To the idf losing scopes and the question about whether other factions should lose em too:

Imho I think all faction should be that way...with fewer scopes...whether it is realistic or not. But either way all conventional factions should be equipped equally for balance purposes....that goes for scopes, guided hats, are among the few things I can think of that give certain factions a clear advantage. I thought long ago it was discussed that u devs moved away from absolue reality for balace purposes and gameplay?

And what's up with sangin?

It's not called asymmetric warfare without a reason.

Scopes for Blufor and none for Ins is the thrill of insurgency. Ins forces have other advantages over blufor (instant spawn, ability to plan ambushes etc.). If you want scopes vs. scopes, go play AAS.

[R-DEV]AfterDune wrote:There's a total of 160 votes at this moment, of which 46.88% is fine with the current setup (= 75 people). The remaining 85 would like to see a change, varying from bringing back some binocs to bringing back all.

There are way too little votes in order for the poll to mean anything (for either "side", that is).

[R-DEV]AfterDune wrote:This thread keeps going in circles. Half of the (few) people that voted like the change, the other half would like a change to some degree. Whatever we do, there are always people that don't like it.

We've talked about this in the dev forums and we won't be changing anything anytime soon.

/thread

So apparently there are too few votes for a poll to be relevant, but it gets locked after because it is going in circle. The poll was also showing that a majority of people don't like the new change.

May I know why you don't even let the thread go on and give the ability the let more people vote? how is that a problem to you if it is going in circle? Isn't it the purpose of a debate to oppose two points of view?

You should probably be more open-minded and accept it when people actually don't like your changes, such lack of objectivity, this is unbelievable.

It has been decided. Deal with it.

And next time you're using words like "dictatorship" in a PM towards me, expect a well-deserved vacation.

nAyo wrote:So apparently there are too few votes for a poll to be relevant, but it gets locked after because it is going in circle. The poll was also showing that a majority of people don't like the new change.

May I know why you don't even let the thread go on and give the ability the let more people vote? how is that a problem to you if it is going in circle? Isn't it the purpose of a debate to oppose two points of view?

You should probably be more open-minded and accept it when people actually don't like your changes, such lack of objectivity, this is unbelievable.

So basically you voted for bring back bino's? He has a point that it was just 50/50 and going in circles and if it kept going people would just get angry at each other.

It has been decided. Deal with it.

Dealing with the fact that you close a poll after saying that it's not relevant because there isn't enough votes?
No I'm for sure not gonna deal with such bias.

User infracted for disrespecting the PR team repeatedly. His vacation lasts 14 days.

What will we see first, PR 2 News or BF2 R Patch?

Since these are two completely different teams there is probably no one who can answer this.

nAyo wrote:Dealing with the fact that you close a poll after saying that it's not relevant because there isn't enough votes?
No I'm for sure not gonna deal with such bias.

User infracted for disrespecting the PR team repeatedly. His vacation lasts 14 days.

lol Hows this disrespecting???

[R-DEV]AfterDune wrote: And next time you're using words like "dictatorship" in a PM towards me, expect a well-deserved vacation.

User infracted for disrespecting the PR team repeatedly. As in not only in that post.

ma21212 wrote:lol Hows this disrespecting???

because he isn't making sense and is just upset about the removal of binos. I've adapted to not having them on me at all times. Initially I voted for the "They should only be removed from scoped kits" but since playing some more I like the current system better.

well he did deserve a break after some of those posts. i agree this one on itself is no base for an infraction (ive wrote worse) but combined with before, it was very disrespectfull

Which one of the ADVs is your personal favorit?

Kerryburgerking wrote:Which one of the ADVs is your personal favorit?

Stormer HVM

ma21212 wrote:lol Hows this disrespecting???

It's not.

Why change the BUIS system from Q click to the C button? I find it really annoying >.<

At least put the scope or BUIS icon there instead of S or B.

Like seriously, it's rage inducing annoying.

No discussion on bans or devs decisions, read the rules.

He wasn't whining just here, and just now, hes been constantly annoying. This is privately funded privately run project and all is done for free by enthusiast. If you dont respect that, then you dont belong here.

On topic

the best AAV at all

ffs guys. no taste at all