Page 9 of 10
Posted: 2007-10-31 21:08
by OkitaMakoto
RHYS4190 wrote:Because the M16 in this mod kills almost all the fun of the game IV gotten so sick of it IV stopped playing PR and is waiting for the new patch and the improvement. So right now im got nothing realy to do but then again bordom it better then playing as the American faction.
Wow, no offense, but that really seems like a silly reason not to play. Use the gun as best you can, or request the SAW and play a different role altogether.
Besides... you can always m4 whore it up
*ewww*
Posted: 2007-11-01 05:16
by RHYS4190
No the reson iv stopped playing is because i dont want to get frustrated by getting owned 99% when playing USMC. Theres at least 5 maps that dont have the USMC that the only ones that are fare the rest give an un exeptable advantage to one team.
Posted: 2007-11-01 05:19
by Rhino
RHYS4190 wrote:No the reson iv stopped playing is because i dont want to get frustrated by getting owned 99% when playing USMC. Theres at least 5 maps that dont have the USMC that the only ones that are fare the rest are not. So no my resons are a very good reson not to play.
dont play the maps you dont like? aint hard, you only connect to servers with maps you like, and disconnect if they change to a map you dont like, then connect to another server with a map you like?
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Posted: 2007-11-01 05:22
by OkitaMakoto
Theres also battlearena, a 24/7 Basrah (or does it include more than that? all insurgency? idk)
anyway, yeah, everytime i join it, its Brits Verses Insurgents, Al Basrah. Play that.
Not a US Marine in sight
Posted: 2007-11-01 05:34
by RHYS4190
M16 is bull shit i dont want to know about this mod untill it fixed >: (.
Posted: 2007-11-01 05:36
by OkitaMakoto
Easy. You're heading down the path that no one wants to travel...
Posted: 2007-11-01 05:36
by Rhino
RHYS4190 wrote:M16 is bull shit i dont want to know about this mod untill it fixed >: (.
ok.....
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Posted: 2007-11-01 05:57
by Ironcomatose
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:ok.....
LOL this guys is obviously the l337.
Posted: 2007-11-01 16:54
by Outlawz7
RHYS4190 wrote:M16 is bull shit i dont want to know about this mod untill it fixed >: (.
I LOL'd.
Don't play USMC then
Posted: 2007-11-01 18:00
by Reddish Red
as i always say: Its the user not the tool
Posted: 2007-11-01 18:10
by Sabre_tooth_tigger
Its bit crappy on burst fire but single shot is fine. I dont like it either
Support gun is always available, get one of those
Posted: 2007-11-02 04:28
by RHYS4190
Reddish Red wrote:as i always say: Its the user not the tool
What are you talking about of course it a tool in this circumstance.
Enough I can only take so much stupid bull shit comments before I start killing people. And you all should think about your comments one of you sayed "don’t play USMC then" how the hell is you supposed to do that when mostly all maps are USMC maps hmmm?. So ill see you lot in 0.7 or ill forget and il never see you again. Ether is good
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
.
Posted: 2007-11-02 04:46
by Rhino
RHYS4190 wrote:And you all should think about your comments one of you sayed "don’t play USMC then" how the hell is you supposed to do that when mostly all maps are USMC maps hmmm?. So ill see you lot in 0.7 or ill forget and il never see you again. Ether is good
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
.
maybe you should think about your comments cos in fact only 1/2 of the maps have the USMC on them, + I have already gave you a very easy solution on how not to play maps with the USMC on them.
Posted: 2007-11-02 06:37
by RHYS4190
This is stupid let stop this stupid fighting. ILL try and just play on the non US maps but it difficult. Any way good luck with fixing the M16 up.
Posted: 2007-11-02 09:59
by Ninja2dan
I don't see any problem with the M16 in this mod. The sights are pretty accurate compared to the real thing, burst rate is pretty much right on, and the appearance is just fine.
An M16 will only be accurate out to around 300m, and even at that range it takes skill and practice to hit a target that is stationary. I am a marksman and even I have trouble sometimes hitting a moving target past 250m, and in this game I do pretty well with the M16.
Burst mode will suck at range. The purpose of burst is for providing suppressive or covering fire, and for MOUT combat where close-range fighting occurs and loss of accuracy from burst is minimal. I prefer to get 30 squeezes off than 10 or so anyways.
And I am a former US Army soldier, US Infantry Weapons Expert, and certified armorsmith. I know the M16 as well as anyone else on this forum, and I can say I see no issues with the M16 in game that would prevent myself or anyone wanting to use it over any other base-kit battle rifle.
When you get old enough to handle one of these in real life, and can actually compare it to the ingame version, then I might listen to your complaints with interest. As of now, I see a kid complaining about a weapon in a game because he doesn't know how to use it properly.
Posted: 2007-11-02 10:44
by Rhino
@Ninja2dan, hes comparing it too gameplay, not realism
![Razz :p](./images/smilies/imported_icon_razz.gif)
Posted: 2007-11-02 11:55
by Outlawz7
Yes, the M16 should have a 1337 scope and stopping power of a .50 cal + 1 337 rounds of ammo.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Posted: 2007-11-02 11:55
by RHYS4190
Ninja2dan wrote:When you get old enough to handle one of these in real life, and can actually compare it to the ingame version, then I might listen to your complaints with interest. As of now, I see a kid complaining about a weapon in a game because he doesn't know how to use it properly.
Im not a kid im a writer read this
Why does my country have an alliance with yours we should be fighting to death and are solders running trough your streets burning your homes to the ground. And we shall. ON that day I will come through your door old man with the blood of your countrymen neighbors wives children streaming from my lips down my tabard, on that day you will die.] Pretty good
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
ya : D.[
Any way it not the realism of PR M16 it the hit registration that got me ticked and it poor sights.
Posted: 2007-11-02 11:57
by RHYS4190
Outlawz wrote:Yes, the M16 should have a 1337 scope and stopping power of a .50 cal + 1 337 rounds of ammo.
No it should have good hit reg and sights piggy
Posted: 2007-11-02 12:00
by Outlawz7
It's a 5.56, what did you expect? Enemy being throw up against a wall when shot by one of these?