Masirah

Project Reality announcements and development highlights.
Iguanadjy
Posts: 215
Joined: 2008-04-12 23:31

Re: Masirah

Post by Iguanadjy »

Mats391 wrote:We have like 4 French maps right now and only a single one with French vs MEC, so this is hardly the same BluFor as on everything else.

Indeed! It’s crazy people are never satisfied whatever the amount of new content you guys still manage to provide since 16 years now on a Free now standalone game ... this is so sad...

Btw I’m totally looking foward for this map it looks pretty neat! Keep up the good work guys!

Supporting this game since 0.6 Never gonna give up!
VTRaptor
Posts: 330
Joined: 2015-06-25 14:49

Re: Masirah

Post by VTRaptor »

Never said there's something wrong with the French, but I see that the actual point I've stated clearly got straight up ignored. Out of ~50 modern faction maps (no vietnam, falklands nor ww2) there's like 15 instances of mec, mostly as opfor. These are the numbers for you.

Why can't we have Germany vs Britain, France vs Poland, Canada vs USA, Netherlands vs IDF? Why can't we have nice things?
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: Masirah

Post by Rabbit »

VTRaptor wrote:Never said there's something wrong with the French, but I see that the actual point I've stated clearly got straight up ignored. Out of ~50 modern faction maps (no vietnam, falklands nor ww2) there's like 15 instances of mec, mostly as opfor. These are the numbers for you.

Why can't we have Germany vs Britain, France vs Poland, Canada vs USA, Netherlands vs IDF? Why can't we have nice things?
Because muttrah isnt that far from masirah as both are part of Oman and it would seem strange that it wouldn't be mec.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
Iguanadjy
Posts: 215
Joined: 2008-04-12 23:31

Re: Masirah

Post by Iguanadjy »

VTRaptor wrote: Why can't we have Germany vs Britain, France vs Poland, Canada vs USA, Netherlands vs IDF? Why can't we have nice things?
This would be really nice to have some Of those BLUFOR clash of the titans been waiting this to happen for years, even tried a suggestion thread that was never followed :(

Supporting this game since 0.6 Never gonna give up!
InfantryGamer42
Posts: 495
Joined: 2016-03-16 16:01

Re: Masirah

Post by InfantryGamer42 »

If you want NATO vs NATO maps then start making one. Going around and suggesting it will not make map.
VTRaptor
Posts: 330
Joined: 2015-06-25 14:49

Re: Masirah

Post by VTRaptor »

Like one map would make a difference, right. Diversifying factions on current maps is far easier and changing a lot more than creating a single map and was done in various map packs, events. But these were again, events.

I'm not around anymore, but some time ago I've heard that actually making one map featuring many different factions using their own commo rose voices is doable and at a low cost in disc space.
InfantryGamer42
Posts: 495
Joined: 2016-03-16 16:01

Re: Masirah

Post by InfantryGamer42 »

VTRaptor wrote:I'm not around anymore, but some time ago I've heard that actually making one map featuring many different factions using their own commo rose voices is doable and at a low cost in disc space.
If that is possible, then why not.
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Re: Masirah

Post by Outlawz7 »

VTRaptor wrote: I'm not around anymore, but some time ago I've heard that actually making one map featuring many different factions using their own commo rose voices is doable and at a low cost in disc space.
Yes the PRTA tourney did it recently, it's basically a map loading files from another map.



The idea is its own discussion.
Image
BRZbruh
Posts: 56
Joined: 2020-07-06 19:04
Location: Illinois

Re: Masirah

Post by BRZbruh »

Replace bmp2m with bmp 3. Bmp2 is just going to get deleted in nearly every engagement instantly. At least the bmp 3 has the cannon launched atgm.
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: Masirah

Post by Rabbit »

BRZbruh wrote:Replace bmp2m with bmp 3. Bmp2 is just going to get deleted in nearly every engagement instantly. At least the bmp 3 has the cannon launched atgm.
wut, bmp2m is better than the bmp3.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
PatrickLA_CA
Posts: 2243
Joined: 2009-07-14 09:31

Re: Masirah

Post by PatrickLA_CA »

Yeah, everyone knows 1 ATGM is better than 4 ATGMs that can be launched near instantly one after another.
In-game: Cobra-PR
BRZbruh
Posts: 56
Joined: 2020-07-06 19:04
Location: Illinois

Re: Masirah

Post by BRZbruh »

Rabbit wrote:wut, bmp2m is better than the bmp3.
Well there is a delay on the firing of the atgm for bmp 2. FOr the bmp 3 its instant and almost like a cannon.
Menuen
Posts: 101
Joined: 2014-01-16 10:49

Re: Masirah

Post by Menuen »

BRZbruh wrote:Well there is a delay on the firing of the atgm for bmp 2. FOr the bmp 3 its instant and almost like a cannon.
Yeah and no thermovison and OP Grande launcher.
Coalz101
Posts: 493
Joined: 2017-07-03 11:11

Re: Masirah

Post by Coalz101 »

Does this mean that the French jets will come?
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: Masirah

Post by Rabbit »

Coalz101 wrote:Does this mean that the French jets will come?
No, nothing for the raffle to take off from.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
Coalz101
Posts: 493
Joined: 2017-07-03 11:11

Re: Masirah

Post by Coalz101 »

Rabbit wrote:No, nothing for the raffle to take off from.
Maybe a working catapult and working runway restraints? that seems possible seeing as (Atleast the last time I checked) the french jet has a tail hook.

If that works ^ the next thing is to just make the carrier have a angular deck
InfantryGamer42
Posts: 495
Joined: 2016-03-16 16:01

Re: Masirah

Post by InfantryGamer42 »

Mistrals are not American carriers and they can not support fix wing jets. For that, you would need to make complitly new carrier static.
Coalz101
Posts: 493
Joined: 2017-07-03 11:11

Re: Masirah

Post by Coalz101 »

InfantryGamer42 wrote:Mistrals are not American carriers and they can not support fix wing jets. For that, you would need to make complitly new carrier static.
We could use the british carrier and modify it abit to allow the tail hook to actually work and mean something. (Unrealistic but who gives a shit rn, we've been having russians on a cargo boat for years!)


https://youtu.be/BaIOrH44P-U

This is incase no one remembers ^
Last edited by Rhino on 2020-07-16 07:37, edited 1 time in total.
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: Masirah

Post by Rabbit »

Coalz101 wrote:We could use the british carrier and modify it abit to allow the tail hook to actually work and mean something. (Unrealistic but who gives a shit rn, we've been having russians on a cargo boat for years!)

https://youtu.be/BaIOrH44P-U[/youtube]
https://youtu.be/BaIOrH44P-U

This is incase no one remembers ^
Then what about mec, should they get fighters too to balance out? What should they be using? Now you just enter a rabbit hole no pun intended.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
VTRaptor
Posts: 330
Joined: 2015-06-25 14:49

Re: Masirah

Post by VTRaptor »

There's no Rafale in the game anyways my dudes.
Locked

Return to “Announcements & Highlights”