Page 2 of 4

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 12:52
by Iguanadjy
Mats391 wrote:We have like 4 French maps right now and only a single one with French vs MEC, so this is hardly the same BluFor as on everything else.

Indeed! It’s crazy people are never satisfied whatever the amount of new content you guys still manage to provide since 16 years now on a Free now standalone game ... this is so sad...

Btw I’m totally looking foward for this map it looks pretty neat! Keep up the good work guys!

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 15:25
by VTRaptor
Never said there's something wrong with the French, but I see that the actual point I've stated clearly got straight up ignored. Out of ~50 modern faction maps (no vietnam, falklands nor ww2) there's like 15 instances of mec, mostly as opfor. These are the numbers for you.

Why can't we have Germany vs Britain, France vs Poland, Canada vs USA, Netherlands vs IDF? Why can't we have nice things?

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 15:29
by Rabbit
VTRaptor wrote:Never said there's something wrong with the French, but I see that the actual point I've stated clearly got straight up ignored. Out of ~50 modern faction maps (no vietnam, falklands nor ww2) there's like 15 instances of mec, mostly as opfor. These are the numbers for you.

Why can't we have Germany vs Britain, France vs Poland, Canada vs USA, Netherlands vs IDF? Why can't we have nice things?
Because muttrah isnt that far from masirah as both are part of Oman and it would seem strange that it wouldn't be mec.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 15:35
by Iguanadjy
VTRaptor wrote: Why can't we have Germany vs Britain, France vs Poland, Canada vs USA, Netherlands vs IDF? Why can't we have nice things?
This would be really nice to have some Of those BLUFOR clash of the titans been waiting this to happen for years, even tried a suggestion thread that was never followed :(

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 16:11
by InfantryGamer42
If you want NATO vs NATO maps then start making one. Going around and suggesting it will not make map.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 16:30
by VTRaptor
Like one map would make a difference, right. Diversifying factions on current maps is far easier and changing a lot more than creating a single map and was done in various map packs, events. But these were again, events.

I'm not around anymore, but some time ago I've heard that actually making one map featuring many different factions using their own commo rose voices is doable and at a low cost in disc space.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 16:37
by InfantryGamer42
VTRaptor wrote:I'm not around anymore, but some time ago I've heard that actually making one map featuring many different factions using their own commo rose voices is doable and at a low cost in disc space.
If that is possible, then why not.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 16:54
by Outlawz7
VTRaptor wrote: I'm not around anymore, but some time ago I've heard that actually making one map featuring many different factions using their own commo rose voices is doable and at a low cost in disc space.
Yes the PRTA tourney did it recently, it's basically a map loading files from another map.



The idea is its own discussion.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 19:07
by BRZbruh
Replace bmp2m with bmp 3. Bmp2 is just going to get deleted in nearly every engagement instantly. At least the bmp 3 has the cannon launched atgm.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 19:23
by Rabbit
BRZbruh wrote:Replace bmp2m with bmp 3. Bmp2 is just going to get deleted in nearly every engagement instantly. At least the bmp 3 has the cannon launched atgm.
wut, bmp2m is better than the bmp3.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 20:02
by PatrickLA_CA
Yeah, everyone knows 1 ATGM is better than 4 ATGMs that can be launched near instantly one after another.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-06 21:22
by BRZbruh
Rabbit wrote:wut, bmp2m is better than the bmp3.
Well there is a delay on the firing of the atgm for bmp 2. FOr the bmp 3 its instant and almost like a cannon.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-10 08:37
by Menuen
BRZbruh wrote:Well there is a delay on the firing of the atgm for bmp 2. FOr the bmp 3 its instant and almost like a cannon.
Yeah and no thermovison and OP Grande launcher.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-11 10:44
by Coalz101
Does this mean that the French jets will come?

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-11 13:13
by Rabbit
Coalz101 wrote:Does this mean that the French jets will come?
No, nothing for the raffle to take off from.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-15 11:57
by Coalz101
Rabbit wrote:No, nothing for the raffle to take off from.
Maybe a working catapult and working runway restraints? that seems possible seeing as (Atleast the last time I checked) the french jet has a tail hook.

If that works ^ the next thing is to just make the carrier have a angular deck

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-15 11:59
by InfantryGamer42
Mistrals are not American carriers and they can not support fix wing jets. For that, you would need to make complitly new carrier static.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-15 12:26
by Coalz101
InfantryGamer42 wrote:Mistrals are not American carriers and they can not support fix wing jets. For that, you would need to make complitly new carrier static.
We could use the british carrier and modify it abit to allow the tail hook to actually work and mean something. (Unrealistic but who gives a shit rn, we've been having russians on a cargo boat for years!)


https://youtu.be/BaIOrH44P-U

This is incase no one remembers ^

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-15 12:29
by Rabbit
Coalz101 wrote:We could use the british carrier and modify it abit to allow the tail hook to actually work and mean something. (Unrealistic but who gives a shit rn, we've been having russians on a cargo boat for years!)

https://youtu.be/BaIOrH44P-U[/youtube]
https://youtu.be/BaIOrH44P-U

This is incase no one remembers ^
Then what about mec, should they get fighters too to balance out? What should they be using? Now you just enter a rabbit hole no pun intended.

Re: Masirah

Posted: 2020-07-15 18:14
by VTRaptor
There's no Rafale in the game anyways my dudes.