Project Reality Forums

Awesome work - glad to see the QBZ get some pampering.

My fav rifle

Daishi2442 wrote:Frankly, I don't think any of the defaults are of decent quality. The MP5 is horribly low poly, the PKM is just flat out ugly, the chinese pistol and M9 look like they had their polycount cut and their textures halved, and the missile launchers are just this side of lowpoly.

PPSh has extremely low poly model aswell it seems :/

Otherwise, nice to see ironsight improvements.

Yes, but its increasing the performance. You know what is one of the main things making a game? It must reach high performance and good looking in the same time. So developers must chose between quality and performance.

P.S. Looks good.

Soooo much new stuff soooo fast

Cool stuff, nice surprise.

Looks realy good =)

Cossack112 wrote:Yes, but its increasing the performance. You know what is one of the main things making a game? It must reach high performance and good looking in the same time. So developers must chose between quality and performance.

Most PR players have high graphics settings and the vanilla models don't look good.

I like to PRC guns although is it just me or does the lmg they employ not hold much?

Cossack112 wrote:Yes, but its increasing the performance. You know what is one of the main things making a game? It must reach high performance and good looking in the same time. So developers must chose between quality and performance.

P.S. Looks good.

actually the new weapons are better performance wise, than the old ones, even though their tri count is higher.

many of the current weapons that are ingame only have a lod1 and 2 (these are level of details that you see at different ranges)

For instance, the QBZ only had lod0-2, while the new one has lod0-3 and is optimized to work better at ranges, that means that the whole system is optimized properly.

you can easily have a high tri count on a weapon in this engine, but if you don't handle it properly and optimized it, then eventually it is going to pull on the performance of the system.

I'd be happy if the focus was on the gameplay, not in new
weapons, vehicles and stuff like that...

anyway, great job

Epipen wrote:I'd be happy if the focus was on the gameplay, not in new
weapons, vehicles and stuff like that...

anyway, great job

We are not all coders and similar. There is only so much a team member can do, and this is one of them.

And trust me when i say that gameplay and similar is always under discussion and being thought about a lot within the team.

Remember it is not all you can see but underneath the calm surface there is a raging storm of ideas.

i like the new QBB.. but the rest imo are kind of pointless. great nonetheless.

Thank god, we needed a new Chinese marksman. That was a terrible model.

[R-DEV]bosco wrote:See people, no need to fear that the focus is only on BLUFOR

Meh only took a few year's of new blufor weapon's to get to opfor

Nice stuff tho even if it is long overdue

Maxfragg wrote:great, that will also mean scoped MG for china finaly (as well as probably unscoped marksmen)

We just played failed clan match on Qwai River last week, I have put in a shift with Chinese LMG: scoped and single-shot mode, the beast of a thing, rapid-fire medium-range sniper.

Would be nice to have both scoped and unscoped (map dependent, right-click choseable, or unscoped spawnable/scoped requestable (2 per team or somesuch).

Trooper909 wrote:Meh only took a few year's of new blufor weapon's to get to opfor

Nice stuff tho even if it is long overdue

yeah the new RPG, AKs etc didn't arrive til now.

Sweet,i can't wait to pwn the Marines and the Army with those bad-boys! Keep up the good work!

[R-CON]Rudd wrote:yeah the new RPG, AKs etc didn't arrive til now.

Not to forget MEC got the G3 series long before the M16A4's were done, USMC cranked around with vanilla M16A2s with 4x zoom on ironsights.