Re: Project Reality Highlights Reel #7
Posted: 2010-08-05 19:26
im quite excited, with 0.92 right around the corner ![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Same highlight is listed twice.'[R-DEV wrote:2Slick4U;1406897']
- Other Featured Highlights
0.92 next week?dtacs wrote:I'm curious as to this as well. I remember a DEV saying awhile back that since EOTechs aren't standard issue and its the soldiers' choice to use them that they wouldn't be in game. Is this still the case or are the Candians and US now issuing these to troops? Regardless of that, good post, looking forward to the AAV.
0.92 in 5...4....
I think there are a couple of comm factions that are quite close to being ready. They'll probably stay secret as long as possible.Snazz wrote:Also, no mention of the Germans in this reel?
Secret?SchildVogel wrote:I think there are a couple of comm factions that are quite close to being ready. They'll probably stay secret as long as possible.
you can't put everything in one reel, they were too late and maybe will be featured in next reelSnazz wrote:Also, no mention of the Germans in this reel?
An extra link would fit.[R-DEV]DankE_SPB wrote:you can't put everything in one reel
That implies there's some sort of deadline, which doesn't make sense when you can edit a post anytime you like.[R-DEV]DankE_SPB wrote:they were too late
No, it won't.Snazz wrote:An extra link would fit.
You're wrong, drop this pointless argument.That implies there's some sort of deadline, which doesn't make sense when you can edit a post anytime you like.
Since you just say "No, you're wrong" without reasoning, any form of objective discussion with you seems pointless.[R-DEV]DankE_SPB wrote:No, it won't. You're wrong, drop this pointless argument.
There is a deadline for it. As for reasoning, see aboveSnazz wrote:Since you just say "No, you're wrong" without reasoning, any form of objective discussion with you seems pointless.
Hopefully someone else will explain why it can't be edited.
An extra link would fit.
there are too many of them.No, it won't.
There's been no explanation as to why news posts can't be edited. I'm curious as every other type of post on the forum can be edited.'[R-DEV wrote:DankE_SPB;1407572']There is a deadline for it. As for reasoning, see above
If there is a limit to the amount of links in a post, there's actually one link being wasted on the 'New shader for 3D Optics' as it's listed twice under 'Coding:' and 'Graphics:'.[R-DEV]DankE_SPB wrote:there are too many of them.
I never said it cant be edited, i said we're not going to edit it, because its pointless and i gave you reasoning why some highlights are not in.There's been no explanation as to why news posts can't be edited
1# bosco collects the updated dev blogs and highlights that he thinks would be suitable for a Highlight (this happened a week before the big German faction release was announced IIRC)Snazz wrote:There's been no explanation as to why news posts can't be edited. I'm curious as every other type of post on the forum can be edited.
If there is a limit to the amount of links in a post, there's actually one link being wasted on the 'New shader for 3D Optics' as it's listed twice under 'Coding:' and 'Graphics:'.