Page 11 of 18
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 02:19
by ReadMenace
agentscar wrote:Yea you are asking for alot...
Yea,The USI mod Abrams,and Bradley are perfect replacements...Because the USMC still use the M1A1...And their Bradley is just,perfect,lol.Though I'm pretty sure the "burst" mode on the bradley is 3 shots,not 4...ALSO,Why don't those M4's have the same ACOG's as the USMC M16's?
BTW,This is turning into an Army suggestion thread..Let's keep it about the feedback of the news update...
Because the ACOGs used on M4s are different.
-REad
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 02:45
by agentscar
Well,PR has taken the following from USI :
-AH-1 "Littlebird"
-A-10
-SU-25 "Frogfoot"
-Humvee
-Supply trucks
-F-16
-BRDM + variants
-T-62
So I don't see why they don't use their Abrams/Bradley too,lol.This isn't mentioned much I think,leaving USI un-credited in a way,so thought I'd inform some of you...Not trying to target PR though.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 03:53
by greenfire07
agentscar wrote:Well,PR has taken the following from USI :
-AH-1 "Littlebird"
-A-10
-SU-25 "Frogfoot"
-Humvee
-Supply trucks
-F-16
-BRDM + variants
-T-62
So I don't see why they don't use their Abrams/Bradley too,lol.This isn't mentioned much I think,leaving USI un-credited in a way,so thought I'd inform some of you...Not trying to target PR though.
didnt they get those from armored fury and euro force?
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 03:56
by agentscar
No...They don't even near resemble the ones from that...
And anyways,none of that is in any of those expansions packs,except for the A-10,Littlebird,and Frogfoot,which are in Armored Fury...But those are very crappy...
Those are all from U.S. Intervention my friend.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 04:03
by greenfire07
i guess your right, i dont have any of them i just guessed.
noting something from earlier, why wont riflemen have full auto m4's? my stepdad is going to Iraq next week, and everyone in the army is issued a full auto m4, with some sort of holographic sight on it. also, the lack of night vision mounts still bugs the **** outta me, dont know why either.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 04:16
by agentscar
Exactly,I know quite a few grunts in the U.S. Army and Airborne gies,and they all have full auto capable M4's...Some of the grunts I know that've been to Iraq tell me how they used to get chewed out for going full auto pointlessly on targets while in combat.And Airborne gies tell me how they hate it when they hear about/see grunts doing that,lol.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 05:11
by CodeSpartan
Um... what? The M4 is single shot and burst. There's the M4A1, which can go full auto, but I don't think that's issued to everyone in the army. I have a cousin going into the Army and he only mentioned using burst.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 05:59
by Jaymz
greenfire07 wrote:why wont riflemen have full auto m4's? my stepdad is going to Iraq next week, and everyone in the army is issued a full auto m4, with some sort of holographic sight on it. also, the lack of night vision mounts still bugs the **** outta me, dont know why either.
Is your stepdad SF or a Delta Operator? Because they're pretty much the only units issued the M4
A1.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 06:35
by 808-SLUGGO
im pretty sure all M4's issued to the average US army foot soldier aren't modified to fire full auto but only single and burst
(think.. if all M4's were full auto.. the Squad AUTOMATIC Weapon M249 would be pretty irrelevant)
however i think greenberets and other SF can modify their M4 to fire full auto or their just flat out issued the M4A1 on deployment
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 06:58
by ReadMenace
808-SLUGGO wrote:
(think.. if all M4's were full auto.. the Squad AUTOMATIC Weapon M249 would be pretty irrelevant)
Quick barrel changes
-REad
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 08:23
by Teek
Hauler wrote:Why not just work out an agreement with USI and take their models? They are absolutely fantastic.
we do have a agreement, but it is a trade, you cant take all the models from one mod without giving something back.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 17:35
by agentscar
All the stuff that USI has given to PR...I haven't seen one thing in from PR in USI,except the M14,and Destructable environments...
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 17:36
by greenfire07
yes, i talked to him yesterday and he has an m4a1 at home, but not in the army, once again i am wrong. he is an MP
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 17:40
by Ironcomatose
agentscar wrote:All the stuff that USI has given to PR...I haven't seen one thing in from PR in USI,except the M14,and Destructable environments...
I thought they gave us the M14. PR did give them Ejod desert right?
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 17:46
by Rhino
agentscar wrote:All the stuff that USI has given to PR...I haven't seen one thing in from PR in USI,except the M14,and Destructable environments...
we have gave them loads...
Little bird, maps, help M14 which you could say is also from EOD, game modes, python code, we are there to help each other.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 18:06
by Petey
soo is USI and PR like brothers?
btw WHERE IZ UPDATE NUMBUH TWOOO!!!!
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 18:07
by LtSoucy
^yes and are parents are BSS. And its coming i'm sure.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 18:25
by agentscar
Yea,lol
BSS parent
USI & PR whiny,spoiled, brats,lol jk.
Yea,You did give them Ejod,but I wasn't sure about the Littlebird...Oh well.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-15 22:55
by Viper5
EJOD went to USI from PR. The M14 came from EOD. The LBs came from all over. IIRC the original transport is from PR, the 2 armed versions are from elsewhere.
Re: US Army Update Part 1
Posted: 2008-06-16 04:00
by HughJass
the only thing that is awesome in usi imo is the abrams, what a beauty.