Suchar wrote:It is part of a message sent by Mineral. I don't know where it was originally posted, I guess it was sent as a PM to all license administrators since I can't find it on the forum.
(@Edit: It must be somewhere on the forum judging from another part of it - will link it once I find it)
Wow. Keep looking there, Suchar. That's kindof important.
If this is part of the License Agreement, then it needs to be part of the License Agreement on account of that's how License Agreements work. Those of us who like to run servers do our best to comply with these things and to support the devs and greater community as a whole.
Am I taking crazy pills?
Just checked through 3 different inboxes spanning a decade and came up empty - maybe I missed something. Please keep looking for that, I would like to be sure you are not missing anything on a relative contextual level, etc.
When have any PR Servers had at least one Admin online at all times 24/7, 365? How many PR Servers remain online 24/7 365 days/year? We've been doing the COOP thing at VG for ten years, and we're an international community like many here, but there can be two to few hours between one Admin going offline and the next one coming online... Never has anyone
ever stated to me or anyone at VG that the last PR Admin leaving to go to bed had to take the ball with him and kick all the kids off the playground. Servers like ours devolve into chaos less than 20% of the time when a PR Admin is offline, and run just fine for a majority of the time.
That would literally kill the game. And this has never been the standard for any server AFAIK - to kick out players enjoying the game just because the last Admin had to run out to dinner. Should we take a poll here?
Do you, Suchar, make sure your server is offline every time the last Admin leaves the server, to be turned online again once the next Admin wants to join and start playing?
Suchar wrote:Moreover, the license itself says:
'Proper administration' also means that there must be some kind of administration - it can't be non-existent.
Given everything I wrote in my previous reply regarding the number of routes that players have to deal with disruptive players, in what way would we be expected to assume that the server being online for a period between the last PR Admin leaving and the next one joining would fall under the category of not being properly administrated, that this would be considered bringing PR into disrepute?
Let's not split hairs here and pay attention to the clearly obvious spirit of this license in that servers require a sufficient PR Admin base and need to provide a means to their players to deal with issues in a fair and friendly way through preferred contact methods of their choosing. Like others, our server can have Admins online in TS3/Discord but perhaps not in game at the time, and we emphasize that to players over time. Many routes for help.
Even in it's peak, PR had plenty of servers with periods of absence between Admins on the server, that's just the randomness of life and our many different regional time zones. Does not matter that the population as a whole is less than it was.... would be unwise to shut down servers between one Admin logging out and another logging in. I would feel terrible for the players if that was a standard on any PR Server anywhere.