Yes, because with M14 the firefight(if 1v1) ends as soon as you click.Nightingale87 wrote:Do you really take all that into consideration in the 3-4 seconds that a firefight lasts????....
Allahu Akbar wrote:1. a round being stopped by armour doesn't mean zero damage is caused.
2.Also how many armor can stop depends on whether it's ceramic or solid metal plate, thickness...etc.
The damage is done to the armored plate if nothing else(there's a reason why soft armor is needed behind hard plate).Bonecrusher76 wrote:1. The amount of energy delivered downrange, due to air resistance, is always less than the amount of energy (recoil) received by the shooter. The round will never deliver more energy than the recoil it produces. Therefore, a plate fully stopping a round results in zero damage.
The problem is that we can't simulate degradation of body armor(at least no way in bf2 engine that I know of).Bonecrusher76 wrote: 2. I agree with you, but since the DEVs already said players in game will only be using standard FMJ and not "special AP rounds", it is reasonable to assume that ceramic plates will stop several, and metal plates will stop many, many, many, more.
As mentioned above, no plate can completely mitigate damage.Bonecrusher76 wrote: Therefore, I again ask that in the interest of strict realism, all plate shots do absolutely zero damage.
Medic heal/revive is a gameplay necessity to keep squad together.Bonecrusher76 wrote: I think we would all also agree that the horribly unrealistic medic healing and revive system should be completely removed from the game. A wound should require the player to spend months in the PR hospital and years in PR physical therapy before returning to duty.
Remove all MG3's scopes or bring in the HK21E because muh G3 platform.tankninja1 wrote:I've found it has a pretty dramatic impact on infantry combat of Bijiar Canyons, in combination with other changes to the IDF. Not only does 5.56 occasionally not even do enough damage to cause bandage required injuries but the giant red dot makes it difficult to aim for body parts where 5.56 actually does damage.
The MEC MG3 has also become an extremely powerful weapon. Most NATO countries don't have anything that can rival it since most of the FN MAGs lack scopes making them kinda useless in a lot of situations, especially maps like Bijiar where infantry usually shoot at each other from opposite hills a mile away.
They want a new rifle every other year. Yet despite wasting millions, possibly billions, they just keep coming back to the M16/M4.
Try Sbeneh. Much fun 1shot-scope-autorifle vs 3shot-ironsightsHeavy Death wrote:Played a round of Shijia on the Chinese side, noticed no real changes that would alter my gameplay whatsoever. But then again, its similar caliber and both sides are wearing armor.
332 stupid posts.DogACTUAL wrote:Is it an option to make a model like RO or RS where every gun is a one or two hitter, so it doesn't really matter if guns are OP? Could be plausible, because remember wounded state in PR is only incapacitation, i guess IRL one or 2 rifle rounds should incapacitate someone (depending on circumstance).
Welp, it does work very well on RO, and it's not the most milsim game precisely.fecht_niko wrote:332 stupid posts.
It's always funny to read the bs you suggest. Pls do us a favour and go back to arma.
Go back to EA/DICE games, they have exactly the kind of perfect symmetrical balance you crave for, where everything is mediocre in the same way. I am serious. If you had your way everytime, PR would slowly turn into Battlefield 3<.Pls do us a favour and go back to arma.
What is this? A person that actually examines the points people make and don't dismiss them ignorantly before even trying to consider them?Welp, it does work very well on RO, and it's not the most milsim game precisely.
No, the previous system with well thought out damage was perfect for PR. Guns had relative damage that represented their caliber well and played out realistically. What you're suggesting would be as mad as the current system, if not more.DogACTUAL wrote:Is it an option to make a model like RO or RS where every gun is a one or two hitter, so it doesn't really matter if guns are OP? Could be plausible, because remember wounded state in PR is only incapacitation, i guess IRL one or 2 rifle rounds should incapacitate someone (depending on circumstance).
I think the major issue with increased damage is that there is so much variance in your round (will it register, high ping etc) that it only amplifies the engines issues.DogACTUAL wrote:Is it an option to make a model like RO or RS where every gun is a one or two hitter, so it doesn't really matter if guns are OP? Could be plausible, because remember wounded state in PR is only incapacitation, i guess IRL one or 2 rifle rounds should incapacitate someone (depending on circumstance).
