Project Reality Forums

Zemciugas wrote:Why would you make the PCS if it's not even used? Anyway, can't wait to see it with a holo sight.

It was coming down to the overall looks of the gun with the scope. PCS6 meant to look good on beryl but it does not.

It will be better for MGs I think, not for assault rifles.

3x magnification is enough.

sems like you guys should spend some time doing some in depth research on what is used and how much etc.

about the 3x, we have one in the works that might be used (providing it is what is used by polish forces)

[R-COM]H.sta wrote:sems like you guys should spend some time doing some in depth research on what is used and how much etc.

Its unique to Polish Army that we have some quantity of everything.

[R-COM]Fresz wrote:Its unique to Polish Army that we have some quantity of everything.

Decide with what makes the faction most unique, or try to balance the different weapons and scopes with different kits.

I have a question about Eotech. We found that eotech used in PR does not match our Beryl. We believe that problem is not with our beryl, but with eotech itself. Grip of our beryl has been made with photo references, which shows length of its individual elements. We have another model of eotech, and it matches our beryl, could we use it instead of PR one? Please?

Grober wrote:I think we should use PR version of EOTech and make our weapons resize to fit into PR

Yes, but that would mean breaking the weapon real size and length. I know how it supposed to look like and I'm making questions now, not statements.

There's different models with different sizes of EOTech holo sights.

Stealthgato wrote:There's different models with different sizes of EOTech holo sights.

Exactly what I mean and the one used for m4/m16 in PR just don't fit our Beryl's grip.

edit: it is also not performance issue, we are not expecting to load on one map both eotech models because we dont expect that polish army will fight against usmc or canada.