Page 3 of 7
Posted: 2008-04-13 09:55
by Mora
Whats the asset on this map? Are there apcs,(attack)choppers?
Posted: 2008-04-13 09:59
by Katarn
I demand more images!
Posted: 2008-04-13 10:17
by HughJass
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:and you should not follow his path by posting what he gave to you. You should in fact never have even looked at it if you really appreciate what we do here. Thous shots where taking not long after v0.6's release and are very out of date anyways.
sorry
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
hopefully this does not jeopardize my chances of becoming a tester :\ stupid PM
Posted: 2008-04-13 10:35
by Rhino
Mora wrote:Whats the asset on this map? Are there apcs,(attack)choppers?
we never state the assets on a map so long before its public release but you can assume its going to be something a little like Gulf of Oman and Jabal etc.
Posted: 2008-04-13 10:46
by DonDOOM
Can't wait for the 0.8
![Razz :p](./images/smilies/imported_icon_razz.gif)
Posted: 2008-04-13 10:51
by Reddish Red
Reminds me of western Sahrani beaches, in Armed Assault
Posted: 2008-04-13 12:33
by LtSoucy
Jonny wrote:I demand you post some for us!
I demand he is right. And looks great, i can picture the tracers flying over my head as I hit the soft sand thats red with blood.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
??:
And congrats Duckhunt!
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Posted: 2008-04-13 12:59
by kilroy0097
Let me say just simply that the map pic looks amazing. The sunlight, the clouds the beaches with the shallow water and tank traps. An assault from the LHD is going to be very bloody I can already tell. I can see it's going to take coordination and less tard rushing to take those beaches if they are defended well. I look forward to the challenge and very much look forward to seeing more of this map in the future.
To Dr.Rank, Rhino and Duckhunt, a big thank you for your hard effort.
Posted: 2008-04-13 13:01
by hall0
Great news allways wondered what happend to this map
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 2008-04-13 14:39
by youm0nt
Yep, certainly been a while since we last heard of this map.
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f12-pr ... -22-a.html
![Image](Yep,%20certainly%20been%20a%20while%20since%20we%20last%20heard%20of%20this%20map.%0Ahttps%3A//www.realitymod.com/forum/f12-project-reality-news/18248-project-reality-v0-6-update-march-22-a.html)
Of course, that was only a WIP
Posted: 2008-04-13 15:01
by Maxfragg
the question is why has it been changed from UK to US ? (the old news said it should be a UK map, but Dr Rank said it will be US
Posted: 2008-04-13 15:13
by Rhino
Maxfragg wrote:the question is why has it been changed from UK to US ? (the old news said it should be a UK map, but Dr Rank said it will be US
Main reason being that the britis in there current state dont have the correct assets to really pull off a good amphibious assault map.
The Warrior, not a amphibious APC (mainly cos its a IFV
![Razz :p](./images/smilies/imported_icon_razz.gif)
) so there would be no good land transport for the brits. A Viking would need to be crated and I'm pretty sure that ehhh there would be lots of issues in getting one to work well and I doubt we could get the trailer part on it which it really cant go ingame without.
the merlin is having problems at the moment and is currently our only transport chopper.
no light transport choppers like the lynx for the britis which is needed for this kind of map.
all in all, the britis in there current form aint kitted out to be royal marines just yet.
Posted: 2008-04-13 15:15
by Waaah_Wah
Waaah_Wah wrote:Gimme more pics ******!
If a mod can delete this i'll promise that i will never write anything on these forums after drinking...
Posted: 2008-04-13 15:17
by Scot
When they are, its gonna be fooking awesome!! but i do agree, put US on with US vehicles, dont put the Brits on with a Littlebird/Huey as it just wouldnt work.
Posted: 2008-04-13 15:52
by Jantje|NL^
Will there be some real water transport this time?
Instead of only APC's?
Cause the bf2;v RIB's are a real joke.. and should not be implemented.. IMO.
Like a 350hp motor which can't go faster than around... 10 knots?!
BRING IN THE LCACs, LCUs AND SOME REAL RIBs!!!
Posted: 2008-04-13 15:54
by Jantje|NL^
Jantje|NL^ wrote:Will there be some real water transport this time?
Instead of only APC's?
Cause the bf2;v RIB's are a real joke.. and should not be implemented.. IMO.
Like a 350hp motor which can't go faster than around... 10 knots?!
BRING IN THE LCACs, LCUs AND SOME REAL RIBs!!!
and ofcourse some LVCPs!!
sorry for the double post.
Posted: 2008-04-13 15:56
by Maxfragg
if only EA would have brought the LCAC ingame, but not even they could get a vehicle transporter working in bf2
![Very Happy :-D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 2008-04-13 16:00
by Dr Rank
[R-DEV]Katarn wrote:I demand more images!
Oh alright then, you twisted my arm
Check the front page of this post for some additional pics!
Posted: 2008-04-13 16:03
by [T]Terranova7
Jantje|NL^ wrote:Will there be some real water transport this time?
Instead of only APC's?
Cause the bf2;v RIB's are a real joke.. and should not be implemented.. IMO.
Like a 350hp motor which can't go faster than around... 10 knots?!
BRING IN THE LCACs, LCUs AND SOME REAL RIBs!!!
What we really need (If this is going to be a USMC map) are the AAVPs. Though I imagine unless one is already in development, the devs are going to stick with the LAVs.
Amphibious Assault Vehicle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![Image](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c2/Aav.jpg/350px-Aav.jpg)