[Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 9381
- Joined: 2006-06-08 19:13
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
good days... good days...
-
- Posts: 440
- Joined: 2008-01-20 15:07
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
mp5punk wrote:wait what does this stuff do?
It's a changelog....meaning it shows what the DEVs changed from .8 - .85...jeez man.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 2007-01-04 17:11
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
Some like us most hate us
but they all fear us
but they all fear us
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 2008-07-21 21:15
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
I'm a Dude and I understand what's going on.ExisSellos wrote:really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 5919
- Joined: 2005-11-08 00:47
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
OH my god your right he forgot to decode it for you. DB you know you need to hit decode before posting these things silly dude
Its not teasing if you figure it outGeneral Dragosh wrote:wiiiiiiiii here we go again with the teasing
Last edited by CodeRedFox on 2009-01-01 21:33, edited 1 time in total.
"apcs, like dogs can't look up" - Dr2B Rudd
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: 2007-03-03 11:30
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
... really really stupid ... you're right.ExisSellos wrote:really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
-
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 2007-11-24 01:57
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 6733
- Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
what do you expect??
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
-
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 2007-11-24 01:57
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
not this kind of "game" 3 times in a row... First time it was ok... Second i accept it again... But a third time... Where is the kick on that?
-Sig removed-
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 9381
- Joined: 2006-06-08 19:13
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Jonny wrote:MATERIAL: Updated wreck to only be destroyed by C4, Slams, Tank rounds, bombs, heavy machineguns. (dbzao)
Why HMGs?
If a HMG can destroy then why not 40mm nades, 30mm API/HEAT rounds, etc.
Surely you should have to go out of your little fort and deal with the wreck properly!
Maybe you decoded it wrong
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: 2008-06-10 15:30
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Sure hope he did.
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 2008-02-15 22:27
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
You decoded it wrong, Jonny. The word is "mxxxxxxs," so "machineguns" can't fit. "Missiles" is a better fit.Jonny wrote:MATERIAL: Updated wreck to only be destroyed by C4, Slams, Tank rounds, bombs, heavy machineguns. (dbzao)
Why HMGs?
If a HMG can destroy then why not 40mm nades, 30mm API/HEAT rounds, etc.
Surely you should have to go out of your little fort and deal with the wreck properly!
-
- Posts: 3563
- Joined: 2008-08-31 02:48
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Now that'll make wrecks the hassle that they ought to be. I can imagine, that Militia tank on fools road would be as much of a pain on the bridge destroyed or alive.Charity Case wrote:You decoded it wrong, Jonny. The word is "mxxxxxxs," so "machineguns" can't fit. "Missiles" is a better fit.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2008-02-03 22:00
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
how many more builds do u guys think? Im guessing its between 1-3.
-
- Posts: 9270
- Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Well considering 0.85 isn't a patch, it's a new build, i would say from past guesses, .809 so I'll go with, 0.858 or 0.857.Fox_Naturalist wrote:how many more builds do u guys think? Im guessing its between 1-3.
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: 2007-12-25 08:24
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
forgive me for asking but what do the numbers actually mean lol?Scot wrote:Well considering 0.85 isn't a patch, it's a new build, i would say from past guesses, .809 so I'll go with, 0.858 or 0.857.
-
- Posts: 877
- Joined: 2008-10-07 14:21
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
They seem to mean the build number. Current 0.85 build is 0.85_3_. Though I always though they mean the month when the version was released. ops:
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: 2008-09-17 08:49
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
So we have to have the details of the log hidden from us why exactly?
How am I to decide if I want to download it if I don't know what it contains?
-Ben
How am I to decide if I want to download it if I don't know what it contains?
-Ben