Project Reality Forums

Yesh! Very nice!

Very nice

but you guys are awere that there is allready a EoTech modelled?

seeing as this dissapeared to the other page i will just post it here:

'[R-DEV wrote:Chuc;1304279']Because you all have been so nice..

Check first page.

EoTech *** i lve you guys, my new weapon to be whored

also H.sta, thuis is another model, you have the long one, this is the short one... (and its a different version as i see?)

love you guys <3 EoTech, what more could i want?

Gotta love it, Chuc!

XD Chuc..... I love the italics.

Anyways, EOTECH HOLOGRAPHIC RED DOT REFLEX SIGHT YAAAAAAAAAAAAY ^_^ (happy fox)

Whats the point of the Eotech being there if there is no zoom on it, and the front post is still in the way?

Think about it, if you were looking down the sights without the Eotech being there, wouldn't it make a bit more sense?

Go do some research into EoTech's and Reflex sights that isnt MW2 and get back to us.

dtacs you fail. > >

dtacs wrote:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0903/ ... echsss.jpg

Whats the point of the Eotech being there if there is no zoom on it, and the front post is still in the way?

Think about it, if you were looking down the sights without the Eotech being there, wouldn't it make a bit more sense?

One could say the same thing about the M68CCO that is in-game -- and this same response applies: Increased field of view.

-REad

H.sta wrote: but you guys are awere that there is allready a EoTech modelled?

Sometimes we just want to ensure that the quality is at its highest, and therefore we make it ourselves. Especially such an anticipated asset such as the EoTech sight.

In reality, the EOTech doesn't look anything like that when you look down the sight. You have both your eyes open. It looks like a cross hair in real life. All you see is the reticle.

Unfortunately, this would be hard, if not impossible, to model.

[R-CON]ReadMenace wrote:One could say the same thing about the M68CCO that is in-game -- and this same response applies: Increased field of view.

-REad

But is it really that much?



I don't think it is, I would go so far as to say I'd prefer ironsights as the upper area of the Aimpoint is quite blocky.

What I can see happening with this on the C7 is what is happening with the M4A1, rather than taking accurate, single shots like the proper rifleman should be, its going to be a sprayfest in the hope, nay, GUARANTEE that the whole mag will kill the enemy at a range of ~70m.

Will stick with the Elcan.

But is there any confirmation of what the secondary rifleman kit will be getting, or what kits the EOtech/irons will be going to?

That's still up to debate about weapon assignments, but we gotta plough through the work first.

Gotta agree about the blockiness of the aimpoint on m4, used to be horrible on the m16 in 087, but in 09 m16 w/ aimpoint is epic win, m4 is kinda meh. Its still better for me than ironsights bcuz now the red dot is small which makes it better for long range cuz the sight isnt bigger than the person ur aiming at.
Eotech's top part seems to be quite big 2, and is the crosshair as big as it is in MW2 IRL?

Edit: YouTube - Eotech holographic sight, AR15
This is uber!

The new weapons look very good, can't wait to see them in game

This looks great. Keep up the good work.

Been waiting for EO tech sights for ages, nice job looks brilliant

Sabre-Oz wrote:Go do some research into EoTech's and Reflex sights that isnt MW2 and get back to us.

'Us'? Explain to me sabre why my reasoning is wrong without being a tool. From what I've seen you never really contribute anything to the debate but rather demean those who are taking part in it.

LithiumFox wrote:dtacs you fail. > >

If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. At least try to contribute something.

Loving the update, as i much prefer irons to scopes in most situations and with Canadians being all scope i was kinda disappointed.