Project Reality Forums

Why has there been a lack of eye catching video trailers for new features etc

[R-CON]Psyrus wrote:I believe they were made at the same time as the Russian faction (or a bit after), and were originally named "chechen rebels" but then to make it a more versatile faction, it was renamed.... I think... this was yeeaaaars ago now.

Nope, originally in 0.6 they were based off arms dealers (Georgian or Chechen IIRC?) and included with Mestia. In 0.85-7 they were called Chechens so the Russians would have maps to play with before Silent Eagle and Beirut came around. When they were released in 0.9, the Chechens became the Militia again to justify Siege at Ochamchria or something like that...

ElshanF wrote:Why has there been a lack of eye catching video trailers for new features etc

There was one for 1.1.4, but don't expect anything big and fancy like to 1.0 trailer till we hit important numbers like 1.2,1.3,1.4 etc, those are usually very large releases with a lot of new content worth showing.

[quote=""'[R-CON"]Psyrus;2001701']I believe they were made at the same time as the Russian faction (or a bit after), and were originally named "chechen rebels" but then to make it a more versatile faction, it was renamed.... I think... this was yeeaaaars ago now.[/quote]

The militia where in PR waay before the Russians and where originally called the Militia, but then renamed to Chechens with the inclusion of Russia but then renamed back to Militia as it was a much better fitting name etc.

As for who's idea it was, it was eggmans iirc.

[quote="ElshanF""]Why has there been a lack of eye catching video trailers for new features etc[/quote]

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f196-p ... npipe.html

Apart from that Rhino hehe. How long estimate till 1.2?

What happened to the ZTZ-99 MBT, its lying around in the files but its not being used at all, the old Type 98 even got a camo change?

Export/coding problems that couldn't be fixed in time for release, unfortunately. It'll put be included when those are fixed, but I can't say when that'll be.

Are you actually planning to use Gaskin ((AA-BRDM) anymore? I already suggested to you would make it available for Militia.

Jacksonez__ wrote:Are you actually planning to use Gaskin ((AA-BRDM) anymore? I already suggested to you would make it available for Militia.

Its being used on Khami INS.

X-Alt wrote:Its being used on Khami INS.

In which layout? I've only seen Gopher in Khami ins.

Jacksonez__ wrote:In which layout? I've only seen Gopher in Khami ins.

Std or Alt IIRC, load up the RCON spawner and see.

It's on INS 64

X-Alt wrote:What happened to the ZTZ-99 MBT, its lying around in the files but its not being used at all, the old Type 98 even got a camo change?

As Adrian said, it was finished a long time ago, but we dont the the people to finish the export/coding.

Tim270 wrote:As Adrian said, it was finished a long time ago, but we dont the the people to finish the export/coding.

lel

I would like a history of PR, a tale that can be told and carried down from word of mouth. Do it Rhino!

There would be so much to put into that. Though a general timeline would be a great project for some members of the community to do -nudge nudge-

Why are MEC the only faction that uses just battle rifles? Wouldn't it have made more sense to give them more standard rifles or HK33s, 5.56 version of the G3?

tankninja1 wrote:Why are MEC the only faction that uses just battle rifles? Wouldn't it have made more sense to give them more standard rifles or HK33s, 5.56 version of the G3?

Iran and Pakistan both use the G3 irl, they (or at least Iran) are major parts of a fictional Middle Eastern Coalition.

tankninja1 wrote:Why are MEC the only faction that uses just battle rifles?

If you include PR:F The 1982 Brits and Argies both use the FN FAL series of Battle Rifle.

What happened to this though ?
http://youtu.be/Xbdfja3qtbY

Is there actually a voice that yells "Up!" in the tank when it reloads?