Project Reality Forums

Posted: **2008-06-08 23:23**

Hauler wrote: Also will there be fixes for some problems?

As in bug fixes? Yeah, tons actually. Hopefully we'll fix more problems than we cause this time

Posted: **2008-06-09 00:37**

That digital camo looks great!

Really exciting news

Posted: **2008-06-09 00:59**

Hadn't you allready put the USI HMMWV in Kyongan 'Ni some short lapse of time?
Stryker and M4 looks kick ***.
Cool update.

Posted: **2008-06-09 01:10**

hmm, most pics of frontline army infantry units ive seen have M4's with a vertical handgrip (if no m203) more often than not

no biggy though, great update

Posted: **2008-06-09 01:35**

hx.bjoffe wrote:Hadn't you allready put the USI HMMWV in Kyongan 'Ni some short lapse of time?
Stryker and M4 looks kick ***.
Cool update.

ye but that was only for a test build and we forgot to remove it

If you look at it how ever you will notice its 50.cal is 100% open.

Posted: **2008-06-09 01:47**

So uhh.. Appears the M68CCO is standard for the US Army rifleman... Awesome! *wonders if US Army SpecOps is going to get an M4 with ACOG*

-REad

Posted: **2008-06-09 01:50**

the pics you see above with the M4 with a scope ingame are in fact the M4 with ACOG

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:05**

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:the pics you see above with the M4 with a scope ingame are in fact the M4 with ACOG

Indeed, under closer examination you are correct!
<3 Rhino

-REad

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:33**

VERY NICE!

But you should have just said a few words with a vague picture like DCon's:

"The SandSotrm is comming"

You should have shown the ARMY logo and a blury soldier running through it saying,
"Project Reality strong"

I like the Army, but I am going to join the Marines, if only the Army had jets.....*sigh* O well.

Is the A-10 still going to be there? Because that would suck to ruin the whole map by taking out the CAS aircraft just because the forces switch..Also, it says Air Force on the pilot helmets.

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:40**

'[=TC= wrote:nuetron;695600']VERY NICE!

But you should have just said a few words with a vague picture like DCon's:

"The SandSotrm is comming"

You should have shown the ARMY logo and a blury soldier running through it saying,
"Project Reality strong"

I like the Army, but I am going to join the Marines, if only the Army had jets.....*sigh* O well.

Is the A-10 still going to be there? Because that would suck to ruin the whole map by taking out the CAS aircraft just because the forces switch..Also, it says Air Force on the pilot helmets.

Good Luck with that.
They split flight classes in two
Navigator School
Pilot School or something like that name.

My dad got put into Nav. School.
He then became a Electronic Warfare Officer in the B-52s.

But that was the USAF
<--------------------------------------------------------->

Anyway Nice update. Skins nice. Stryker Awesome. Can't wait to see the Bradley.

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:43**

Finally! I can now spawn with an M4! Thank you... So much.

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:46**

'[=TC= wrote:nuetron;695600']VERY NICE!

But you should have just said a few words with a vague picture like DCon's:

"The SandSotrm is comming"

DC / DCon is based on the gulf war, PR is not, hence why "sandstorm" is appropriate to them and not for us

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:46**

Great update, mucho love for all involved!

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:47**

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:DC / DCon is based on the gulf war, PR is not, hence why "sandstorm" is appropriate to them and not for us

He was using it as an example

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:50**

ironcomatose wrote:He was using it as an example

Though I do wish he'd put more thought and research in his suggestions.

Posted: **2008-06-09 02:53**

Feuerwaffen wrote:Though I do wish he'd put more thought and research in his suggestions.

I dont agree with the suggestion because the more info we get the better(

) but i get what he is saying and i dont see anything wrong with it. Its just a different way to advertise. Kinda like the first Batman ads(Why so sad?) without any real info or pics. Thats what he meant.

Posted: **2008-06-09 03:06**

Gunwing wrote:As well as the M1A2 Bradly with side and rear mounted M16A3s for the crew.

The M2 Bradley stopped having side firing ports with the M2A2. It now only has two rear firing port weapons which are aimed by tracers.

The M6 Bradley Linebacker was withdrawn from service a few years ago and they have been converted back into M2A2 and A3 Bradley IFVs.

The Mk-12 is finding a home in conventional US Marine rifle squads. As their squad level DMR, the Army just uses modified M4s/M16A4s, M14s, or just regular M4/M16 series weapons fitted with an ACOG and a bipod.

Posted: **2008-06-09 03:26**

ironcomatose wrote:I dont agree with the suggestion because the more info we get the better( ) but i get what he is saying and i dont see anything wrong with it. Its just a different way to advertise. Kinda like the first Batman ads(Why so sad?) without any real info or pics. Thats what he meant.

Just don't like getting threads of retired airplanes.

Zomg F-117!!!!11111
<------------------------------------------->

I got a title thingy!

"Project Reality..... The Enemy is coming and this time you can't just ban em'"

Posted: **2008-06-09 03:30**

I was wondering, whats up with the color of the Stryker? Isnt it supposed to be green?

http://www.mainandcentral.org/home/main ... ats_lg.jpg

http://www.army-technology.com/projects ... yker_6.jpg

http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/file ... z-iraq.jpg

Posted: **2008-06-09 03:33**

ironcomatose wrote:I was wondering, whats up with the color of the Stryker? Isnt it supposed to be green?

http://www.mainandcentral.org/home/main ... ats_lg.jpg

http://www.army-technology.com/projects ... yker_6.jpg

http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/file ... z-iraq.jpg

Good Point, Did google search and saw no Tan/Brown paint

Project Reality Forums

US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1