BAR 1918

Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

BAR 1918

Post by Rabbit »

Stupid thing sucks compared to its counter parts. Painfully long reload time for just 20 rounds and time for it to settle when in bipod is ****. The fg42 is an far superior to it.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
Wicca
Posts: 7334
Joined: 2008-01-05 14:53

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Wicca »

Isn't that realistic though, every gun nut on youtube loves the FG42 and loathes the BAR.
Xact Wicca is The Joker. That is all.
AlonTavor
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 2991
Joined: 2009-08-10 18:58

Re: BAR 1918

Post by AlonTavor »

should have lower recoil on undeployed BAR so its at least effective as assault rifle, like the RPK-74
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Rabbit »

Wicca wrote:Isn't that realistic though, every gun nut on youtube loves the FG42 and loathes the BAR.
The fact that people think the BAR is overrated does nothing to change gameplay mechanics that are a result of choice and not actual function of it.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
Wicca
Posts: 7334
Joined: 2008-01-05 14:53

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Wicca »

From what the gun-nuts said, it was outdated at the start of world war 2.

https://youtu.be/vw3eKWvDGqQ?t=693

I think this is the source.
Xact Wicca is The Joker. That is all.
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Rabbit »

Again, not the issue here.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
Wicca
Posts: 7334
Joined: 2008-01-05 14:53

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Wicca »

The BAR sucks in comparison with the FG42
Xact Wicca is The Joker. That is all.
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Rabbit »

Wicca wrote:The BAR sucks in comparison with the FG42
That has nothing to do with the choice to give it a stupid long reload time wicca.
Last edited by Rabbit on 2020-05-02 23:22, edited 2 times in total.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
hairyballs
Posts: 46
Joined: 2018-04-18 18:06

Re: BAR 1918

Post by hairyballs »

all the ww2 animations are stupid long
Frontliner
PR:BF2 Contributor
Posts: 1884
Joined: 2012-10-29 09:33

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Frontliner »

Rabbit wrote:That has nothing to do with the choice to give it a stupid long reload time wicca.
Thing is - I don't see anything particularly wrong with its reload in terms how the actual weapon would function though admittedly I don't know for certain. Most weapons in game could argued as either being too slow or too fast depending on whether or not you want reloads to be either be punishing or not.

In the case BAR vs. FG 42 however, the files say reload of one is
ObjectTemplate.ammo.reloadTime 7.9
while for the other it's
ObjectTemplate.ammo.reloadTime 7.375,
when doing "quik maffs" you'll find that's not even a difference of 10%. So, I'd say your complaint of "BAR sucks because reload much longer than the FG42" isn't even correct though of course 0.525 seconds can feel like ages in the wrong situations. :P

I agree that the FG42 is probably a wee bit too strong the way it is set up right now and I told Camo we better be pretending we use the later "J" model which has(compared to the older G model) a reduced but still high enough ROF for the sake of evening the playing field just a little bit - given that the Germans already have 2 high capacity MGs with an unholy ROF.
VTRaptor: but i only stopped for less than 10 secs and that fucking awesome dude put 2 of them

]CIA[ SwampFox: well my definition of glitching is using an enemy kit to kill the enemy

Just_Dave: i have a list about PR players, and they r categorized by their skill

Para: You sir are an arse and not what the game or our community needs.

AlonTavor: Is that a German trying to make me concentrate?

Heavy Death: join PRTA instead - Teamwork is a must there.
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Rabbit »

Frontliner wrote:So, I'd say your complaint of "BAR sucks because reload much longer than the FG42"
I mean, thats not exactly what I am saying. I am saying the BAR sucks already and longer times with it to do things than its counter part make it suck even harder. I'm fine with it having tougher recoil and such, just don't make it suck more than it has to.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
User avatar
Mats391
PR:BF2 Lead Developer
Posts: 7636
Joined: 2010-08-06 18:06

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Mats391 »

I think the deployed mode needs to be the slow firing one. Not much point in going through deploying it just to have it empty after couple seconds.
Image

Mineral: TIL that Wire-guided missiles actually use wire
Frontliner
PR:BF2 Contributor
Posts: 1884
Joined: 2012-10-29 09:33

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Frontliner »

Rabbit wrote:I mean, thats not exactly what I am saying. I am saying the BAR sucks already and longer times with it to do things than its counter part make it suck even harder. I'm fine with it having tougher recoil and such, just don't make it suck more than it has to.
Actually I think it should receive less recoil given its size and weight since the rounds they fire are roughly similar in their specs but the way LMG recoil is handled in PR has always been a bit meh, same with deviation in deployed mode.
VTRaptor: but i only stopped for less than 10 secs and that fucking awesome dude put 2 of them

]CIA[ SwampFox: well my definition of glitching is using an enemy kit to kill the enemy

Just_Dave: i have a list about PR players, and they r categorized by their skill

Para: You sir are an arse and not what the game or our community needs.

AlonTavor: Is that a German trying to make me concentrate?

Heavy Death: join PRTA instead - Teamwork is a must there.
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: BAR 1918

Post by Rabbit »

Frontliner wrote:Actually I think it should receive less recoil given its size and weight since the rounds they fire are roughly similar in their specs but the way LMG recoil is handled in PR has always been a bit meh, same with deviation in deployed mode.
Dunno, I had trouble shooting it irl, but then again I was like 15.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
CptHrki
Posts: 19
Joined: 2019-01-19 18:38

Re: BAR 1918

Post by CptHrki »

It's not the reload, the recoil should be lower. Even at 450 RPM (or whatever it is) deployed, the sights bounce around like crazy. So not only does it fire extremely slowly, you can't even hit anything, it's just atrocious.
robert357
Posts: 227
Joined: 2016-01-29 12:58

Re: BAR 1918

Post by robert357 »

Every weapon in PR bouncing like crazy. BAR, FG42, MGs, STG44 etc. That why there is something called BIPOD and SELECTIVE FIRE. You need use them depending of the situation.
Image
CptHrki
Posts: 19
Joined: 2019-01-19 18:38

Re: BAR 1918

Post by CptHrki »

robert357 wrote:Every weapon in PR bouncing like crazy. BAR, FG42, MGs, STG44 etc. That why there is something called BIPOD and SELECTIVE FIRE. You need use them depending of the situation.
I think I've played enough PR to know that, and the deployed mode is what I was talking about. It's literally the most useless AR gun in the game. Even an RPK is easier to aim in bursts than this thing. Fact is, you can't have a gun that fires extremely slowly, does mediocre damage and on top of that can't hit shit deployed past close range and call it adequate.
M42 Zwilling
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 613
Joined: 2012-06-10 11:27

Re: BAR 1918

Post by M42 Zwilling »

I don't understand the hate for the BAR. Ingame it's a one-shot-kill like the Garand, but with full auto, bigger mags, and deployed mode... and plenty of people already call the Garand OP. I've gotten most of my kills with it by firing single shots, which is easy with the low fire rate. The ability to panic spray full auto at really close range and a deployed mode that works like any other AR in PR make it pretty strong. The FG 42 is even better, but that definitely doesn't make the BAR bad. Any advantage there just helps offset German squads having more bolt actions.
Image


"How many posts have there been about how much better PR was back in 0.X? The fact is that if we played the older versions we would start to remember the shortcomings, but we tend to hold onto the good memories tighter than the bad ones." - Murphy
sweedensniiperr
Posts: 2784
Joined: 2009-09-18 10:27

Re: BAR 1918

Post by sweedensniiperr »

Is it intentional that you can't check your magazine?
Image
UncleSmek
Posts: 1027
Joined: 2008-09-02 05:07

Re: BAR 1918

Post by UncleSmek »

The BAR is a great rifle, right now i feel its a pretty good match to the fg..

The highest kill scores i've had so far in ww2 has been with the BAR.
Post Reply

Return to “Infantry”