If you are doing mapvotes a bit more thought and consideration being put into them would be nice. Yesterday we had something like
1. Burning sands 2. Marlin 3. Goose Green
a 4km, 2km and a 2km respectively. The 2km vote was split and the 4km map won. This gives the appearance of admins attempting to engineer the vote so that a specific result will win.
Some simple vote structuring guidelines like don't put 2km and 4km maps in a 3 way vote would perhaps alleviate this issue.
This also meant we played Hades > Burning Sands, arguably two 4km asset maps back to back. I don't think it would be too much to expect that admins could alternate map types by doing, for example, a 4km mapvote > 2km mapvote, and repeat. Or preferably 2km > 2km > 4km, repeat.