Sbeneh Outskirts - [Gameplay]

IWI-GALIL.556FA · Post by **IWI-GALIL.556FA** » 2013-12-27 16:24

BADASS!!! I can't wait!!!

Post by **K4on** » 2013-12-27 17:00

Hey guys,

I've recorded a few beta gameplay clips of the upcoming map Sbeneh Outskirts, made by our PR community member [ODG]Rabbit.

Take note that the gameplay layers in the video are extremly WIP and massive changes have already been made.

Location: south of Damascus, one of the outlaying suburbs
Size: 2km
Factions: SAF V SFA (placeholder in the video are Taliban and RU Forces)
Game Play Type: Infantry, and Armor

If you are interested in reading more about the map, check out the community modding section:
http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f593-mapping/123874-map-sbeneh-outskirts-2km-wip.html

[YOUTUBEHD]sHWZ13w_QoY[/YOUTUBEHD]

Post by **KaB** » 2013-12-27 17:06

This corridor style map reminds me a lot of Darkest Hour.

SShadowFox · Post by **SShadowFox** » 2013-12-27 20:19

1:44 "Squad 3, zis is tank squad..."

And people say that Germans don't speak like that...

Roque_THE_GAMER · Post by **Roque_THE_GAMER** » 2013-12-27 20:22

so Russians represents the SAA? why they have T-64 and not T-72? the FSA(taliban) have to get T-62s

Rabbit · Post by **Rabbit** » 2013-12-27 20:34

Roque_THE_GAMER;bt9734 wrote:so Russians represents the SAA? why they have T-64 and not T-72? the FSA(taliban) have to get T-62s

Because in the insurgent layers you see the representation of the Republican Guard, bmp-2, solid tan t-72. And in AAS32 you see a less well equipped regular unit with run down bmp-1s and a t-62. Having the Republican Guard equipment wise would be even more of a slaughter.

And my over all decision was have a t-62 is for balance, as its lighter than a t-72, and is still heavily used in the war, with over half having been taken out. Generally if you see the SFA with a tank, its actually a t-55 as most are in storage, or just in strictly defensive position if used by the SAF. Which is how the SFA as captured them.

Post by **Mineral** » 2013-12-27 20:51

Roque_THE_GAMER;bt9734 wrote:so Russians represents the SAA? why they have T-64 and not T-72? the FSA(taliban) have to get T-62s

The one in video's are T-62 tanks I believe... There are no T-64 in PR.

Great video K4on

I liked spooks one too!

Sbeneh cleanup | ??????? ????? ?????? ???????. ???-??????. - YouTube

Psyko · Post by **Psyko** » 2013-12-27 21:10

that map reminds me of EJOD <3

Nugiman · Post by **Nugiman** » 2013-12-27 21:24

looks like i missed an awesome map test

the scenario is great!

IWI-GALIL.556FA · Post by **IWI-GALIL.556FA** » 2013-12-27 21:30

Psyko;bt9737 wrote:that map reminds me of EJOD <3

God I loved Ejod. I've had so many great battles in that little map. I miss it

Roque_THE_GAMER · Post by **Roque_THE_GAMER** » 2013-12-27 21:36

[R-CON]Mineral;bt9736 wrote:The one in video's are T-62 tanks I believe... There are no T-64 in PR.

Great video K4on I liked spooks one too!

Sbeneh cleanup | ??????? ????? ?????? ???????. ???-??????. - YouTube

I wrote wrong, I meant T-62

Roque_THE_GAMER · Post by **Roque_THE_GAMER** » 2013-12-27 21:41

Rabbit;bt9735 wrote:Because in the insurgent layers you see the representation of the Republican Guard, bmp-2, solid tan t-72. And in AAS32 you see a less well equipped regular unit with run down bmp-1s and a t-62. Having the Republican Guard equipment wise would be even more of a slaughter.

And my over all decision was have a t-62 is for balance, as its lighter than a t-72, and is still heavily used in the war, with over half having been taken out. Generally if you see the SFA with a tank, its actually a t-55 as most are in storage, or just in strictly defensive position if used by the SAF. Which is how the SFA as captured them.

just give the insurgents, free HATs and Tanks inside the city and its Balenced

tankninja1 · Post by **tankninja1** » 2013-12-27 22:18

Been a long time since I've seen teamwork like that. Must have been fun.
Also been a long time since I've had my settings that high.

Viikkasota · Post by **Viikkasota** » 2013-12-27 22:59

Why not MEC vs Insurgents?

Post by **Mineral** » 2013-12-27 23:01

Viikkasota;bt9744 wrote:Why not MEC vs Insurgents?

RUS is much more similar to what the SAF one day will be in PR. MEC is has nothing similar in their infantry.

simeon5541 · Post by **simeon5541** » 2013-12-27 23:35

I haven't seen such awesome and realistic yet short clip from PR community
in a long time,you must had great time while playing those rounds.
Even if this map layout would remain (RU vs TLB) I think that it would be
one of visually most realistic looking ones,this clip really resemble ones from
Syria we are getting daily to the maximum.
Oh yeah,congrats to PR team for being in MODDBs top 10 !

hiberNative · Post by **hiberNative** » 2013-12-28 23:30

Looks fun!
I hope I'll get this kind of FPS.

curahee150 · Post by **curahee150** » 2013-12-29 02:15

Judging by the fact that there was a map vote going on in the early part of the vid, i'm guessing that there are other maps that will be released?

tankninja1 · Post by **tankninja1** » 2013-12-29 02:25

[R-CON]Mineral;bt9745 wrote:RUS is much more similar to what the SAF one day will be in PR. MEC is has nothing similar in their infantry.

Well MEC does use Arabic Commo Rose, long term it is less work to use MEC as a placeholder so that the Commo Rose language won't have to be fixed. Unless the mapper has the Russians already using Arabic instead of Russian.