Page 1 of 2
XHD 2560 x 1600 Screenshots warning: big images
Posted: 2008-04-26 08:37
by ARMY RANGER
Posted: 2008-04-26 08:39
by ARMY RANGER
FrameRATE OF 200-100 LOWEST MAXED 16x aa 16x af highest everything
CANT BEAT MY PICTURE! doesnt get any higher muahahaha
Posted: 2008-04-26 09:01
by $kelet0r
what are you using - a hdtv?
Posted: 2008-04-26 09:10
by ARMY RANGER
no a 30 inch Samsung Syncmaster 305 T ON 2560 X 1600 HDTV cant do XHD res becuase it has max res of 1024 x 1280 san compared to mine 2560 X 1600
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Posted: 2008-04-26 09:40
by jOHNNYdOUBE
I went on Vacation to newegg and all I brought back was a lousy 24" Samsung Syncmaster 2493 @ 1920 x 1200 with 99 fps.
Posted: 2008-04-26 09:43
by PFunk
What are your specs might I ask, so that I can write them down and beat off staring at them.
Posted: 2008-04-26 09:52
by ARMY RANGER
QX6700 overclocked to 3.5GHZ 1400FSB LIQUID COOLED 30C-55 total mhz ~ 13310 LOAD core temp log
4GB DDR2 1066 CORSAIR 8500C5 ~ UNDERCLOCKED 800 4-4-4-12
2X 8800 GTX OVERCLOCKED 640CORE 1475 SHADERS 2000MEMORY SPEED
RAPTOR X
680I EVGA SLI
30 INCH MONITER 6MS
Posted: 2008-04-26 10:07
by General_J0k3r
you, my dear, have either too much money or you are a professional.
where is your rig? i come and nick it
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
. btw, QX = extreme edition? (i know, im a noob
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
)
Posted: 2008-04-26 11:01
by Arrigale
Posted: 2008-04-26 11:06
by ARMY RANGER
LOL YEP ME AND YOU
Posted: 2008-04-26 11:25
by Mora
OMG what do you do for living? Bank robbery's??
Posted: 2008-04-26 12:36
by =Romagnolo=
My monitor was RAPED !
Posted: 2008-04-26 16:18
by ReaperMAC
Awesome! How does it fair online?
Posted: 2008-04-26 16:36
by hall0
Awesome now i know how good can bf2 looks like
Posted: 2008-04-26 17:09
by Sabre_tooth_tigger
I think it goes beyond the maximum res Bf2 can provide textures for, dx9 is limited to 2048x2048 but I doubt bf2 caters that high.
Basically there is a depreciating return on image quality, still if you have monitors that large its usefull for spotting distant enemies easily?.
I wouldnt mind one monitor for a full scale map and one for the viewpoint especially when commander, bugs when it stops you walking, etc
Posted: 2008-04-26 18:52
by Deadfast
Threads like this needs to be banned.
Every time I read something like this I fall into a complete frustration as it reminds me how much my PC sucks
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Posted: 2008-04-26 19:04
by Sergeant_Banner
I just think that its a waste for a BF2 based mod ...
You could play BF2 on a 6-core CPU @ 10000Ghz, 500GB RAM 4x 99900GTRSI & an XXXXXXXHD 4096X4096 res monitor and it would still look ****. Not PR's fault, but BF2's.
Now, go do the same with ArmA/Crysis/other graphicly enhanced game, & then we'll see the true power of that beauty =P
Still, i wish i had a 30" monitor
Sarge
Posted: 2008-04-26 22:30
by DeltaFart
fug man! THats amazing
Posted: 2008-04-27 03:17
by ARMY RANGER
Sabre_tooth_tigger wrote:I think it goes beyond the maximum res Bf2 can provide textures for, dx9 is limited to 2048x2048 but I doubt bf2 caters that high.
Basically there is a depreciating return on image quality, still if you have monitors that large its usefull for spotting distant enemies easily?.
I wouldnt mind one monitor for a full scale map and one for the viewpoint especially when commander, bugs when it stops you walking, etc
this guy know wht hes talkin about its actually higher than bf2 will let you go and yes the engine sucks so it can only look that good no better than there pics