Project Reality Forums

Why get a Sniper or H-AT on insurgency? It almost always ends badly for you...



Need I say more? Of course...



...

We raped them like little kids

If a squadmember picks HAT/sniper (or AA...but we'll pretend that doesn't happen) I tell him he's not allowed to leave main until he gets another kit.

Disgusting....but also very true.
But to make this really immature and easy to understand.

There was some
After that we had sniper/hat
Then they were.



And yes I had to do that

If a squadmember picks HAT/sniper (or AA...but we'll pretend that doesn't happen) I tell him he's not allowed to leave main until he gets another kit.

I agree. It's utterly Useless on Insurgency...

Hat is great in insurgency, if your careful with it. Although its a great base defense weapon.

HAT is great in insurgency? So is the LAT if you have to pick a rocket tube. HAT is just useless man. Theres nothing the bad guys can throw at you that you cant take out with LAT's and Grenades and '50's.

The USMC were probably trying to shoot down the PLA messenger pigeons.

cyberzomby wrote:HAT is great in insurgency? So is the LAT if you have to pick a rocket tube. HAT is just useless man. Theres nothing the bad guys can throw at you that you cant take out with LAT's and Grenades and '50's.

take 2 organized squads on archer, get control on center of map(mountain with castle), rape everything with 2 HATs while choppers drop you supplies. Saw cachemark in village?? some HATs in it and cache destoyed

If you make more of a support long range squad in insurgency HaTs can be useful as if you say have a building the blast radius tends to wipe the building out. Also on fallujah west snipers have been used efficiently on there.