Project Reality Forums

Mr DEV's the mod Brazilian / FARC Forces

I'm making this post so you can evaluate the possibility of the introduction of NAPALM !!

Explain:
Instead of conventional artillery terms as we have in the PR, the commander would release of NAPALM ATTACK.

As the scene of battles in the jungle, I believe that would be more real rather than use of conventional artillery.

Once we know that conventional artillery in the jungle just does not work like the other battlefield.

The next BF VIETNAN video showing the attack made by NAPALM F4

I hope you enjoy this suggestion,

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/niRDQ0Mqr8c&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/niRDQ0Mqr8c&hl=pt_BR&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

Napalm is possible in the BF2 engine (Eve of Destruction has it). This has been suggested on numerous occasions before and may be implimented it may not but further suggestions for it are surplus to requirements.

Locked.

doggreen wrote:Mr DEV's the mod Brazilian / FARC Forces.....

Dear doggreen, your setting doesn't allow PM, so...

I never heard about anything similar to napalm strikes here in South America, don't know why you thought it has something to do with the Brazil x Farc conflict, furthermore, we aren't here to create overpowered features only cause its cool, reality please...

Next time try to do a little research, and just wonder why it will be worthy to be in such game.

The focus of the 1st release is the Infantry combat with transport-based choppers and ground vehicles. The FARC don't have equipment to shot down our most advanced equipment, we don't hant to create a conflict between a "overpowered" army and a infantry-based guerilla, that will ruin the expected gameplay for Jungle Infantry combat.
Besides, the Napalm bombing tactic have been considered a War crime by the ONU (Our contry still haves the Napalm bombs and the Flametrowers, but that is another question) and that kind of tactic isn't used by our forces, 1st because the flames ruins the Rain Forest who our army protects with claws and teeths, 2nd because we don't have officialy declared war on anyone, but everybody who cross our contry with ilicits intentions will be killed, and 3rd because it have been declared a War crime by ONU.


Thread Closed