Page 1 of 1

lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-13 22:19
by illidur
Anybody else feel like there should have been a jet on lashkar? :idea: yeah i realise there are problems with it. bombing their main and no runway. btw thanks dev team for an awsome update!

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-13 22:35
by Hans Martin Slayer
I was expecting someone asking why there aren't any vehicles in SP (yet ;-) ) or something like that.

Instead i find someone asking for jets!! :lol:

Not going to happen, pal.

Map's too small, and like you said, there's no airfield.

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-13 23:16
by illidur
:( I wonder why there isn't an insurgency map thats 4km?

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-13 23:25
by Hans Martin Slayer
Not yet, have a look around the dev blogs. ;-)

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-14 00:22
by Sniper77shot
[R-DEV]Hans Martin Slayer wrote:Not yet, have a look around the dev blogs. ;-)
Hans your maps are awesome. Some of my favourites.

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-14 18:19
by Cassius
Why cant 2 km maps be inflated and surrounded with a more or less featurless terrain around the main game map to include jets ?

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-14 19:41
by Outlawz7
Because what you said makes no sense.

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-14 20:16
by Cassius
Why ? What is so bad about making a 2 km map a 4km one, so the jets have space to maneuver. You would still have the original map, just with more space around it so the jets can maneuver.

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-15 08:19
by theRVD
why have a 4k map with only 2k of good space, than a 4k map with 4k of good space..

Re: lashkar valley

Posted: 2010-02-15 10:45
by Snazz
It'd be a lot easier to just remove the out-of-bounds timer for jets.

But the maps still need airfields and the jets would loiter around the middle of the map anyway.