US Army Update Part 1

Scot · Post by **Scot** » 2008-06-18 22:22

Because IRL the M4 is a Carbine of the M16( shorter barrel, breakable stock etc) and in real life the US Army uses the M4 as their primary weapon. I understand what you are saying, but its real life.

Godddam it Iron..

M_Striker · Post by **M_Striker** » 2008-06-18 23:01

will we see the railing around the outer "Shell" of the Stryker that prevents RPG's from doing extensive damage? Similar to the scimitar... (even though it doesn't help a bit against RPGs in game

)

Alex6714 · Post by **Alex6714** » 2008-06-18 23:07

Karimloo wrote:I like the new skins and the Stryker, But I just dont really like the M4 since it kinda looks like a shorter Model of the m16a4, and the fact its 3 burst why all the other armies have automatic weapons, so why not make it the M4a1 and a new model, the british M4 is amazingly sexy.

P.S. this is not a rant, and im just voicing my opinion

I don´t like the G3, I think all mec should use P90s.

M4 is 3 round burst in rel life, and the M16 in PR has 3 round burst already... I hate burst with passion, but doesn´t mean it should be changed.

Napoleon_TR · Post by **Napoleon_TR** » 2008-06-19 00:28

I thing MEC use Hk-33 (better than g3) Here

or Hk416 Here

Hk Series Best (Only MEC forces)

XxNinjaSinXx · Post by **XxNinjaSinXx** » 2008-06-19 00:40

[R-CON]Alex6714 wrote:I don´t like the G3, I think all mec should use P90s.

M4 is 3 round burst in rel life, and the M16 in PR has 3 round burst already... I hate burst with passion, but doesn´t mean it should be changed.

No country in real life would be stupid enough to replace a main standard assault rifle for a submachine gun or a PDW.

Post by **OkitaMakoto** » 2008-06-19 01:19

M_Striker wrote:will we see the railing around the outer "Shell" of the Stryker that prevents RPG's from doing extensive damage? Similar to the scimitar... (even though it doesn't help a bit against RPGs in game )

I remember being informed that they do in fact up the armor, as the caged area is given a slightly higher armor value... thats iirc, of course.

I also think I saw in this thread earlier that the cage is being looked into/being worked on, but dont quote me on that.

USMC[KILLER] · Post by **USMC[KILLER]** » 2008-06-19 02:55

I assume the Devs have a finished birdcage Stryker..somewhere.

We'll just have to wait till Update 2

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2008-06-19 14:50

'USMC[KILLER wrote:;705820']I assume the Devs have a finished birdcage Stryker..somewhere.
We'll just have to wait till Update 2

Lets hope so.

When will that second update be coming?

LekyIRL · Post by **LekyIRL** » 2008-06-19 14:54

When it's done

agentscar · Post by **agentscar** » 2008-06-19 15:32

Right now,I only know of U.S. Special Forces using the HK-416 so,MEC wouldn't have it...I do think they could get some HK33's though...

Viper5 · Post by **Viper5** » 2008-06-19 15:55

agentscar wrote:Right now,I only know of U.S. Special Forces using the HK-416 so,MEC wouldn't have it...I do think they could get some HK33's though...

Norwegian Army uses it (or 417, not sure). US Special Forces have been banned from using it I believe.

agentscar · Post by **agentscar** » 2008-06-19 16:11

when an ex-green beret helped HK make it..LOL...

Why did they ban it from us?

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2008-06-19 16:27

LekyIRL wrote:When it's done

You have no right to wink!!!! :d rillserg

And yeah i know that was probably the answer i was going to get but i just had to try.

CodeSpartan · Post by **CodeSpartan** » 2008-06-19 16:29

agentscar wrote:when an ex-green beret helped HK make it..LOL...

Why did they ban it from us?

I imagine for the same reasons they banned Dragonskin: commercial/political.

agentscar · Post by **agentscar** » 2008-06-19 16:30

AND,they banned dragonskin...that's stupid!

Viper5 · Post by **Viper5** » 2008-06-19 16:58

Agent-

The makers of Dragonskin/HK416 didnt ban it. The higher ups in the US Special Forces chain of command did.

Dragonskin wasnt selected because it does rather crappy in extreme conditions if I remember what Kenwayy said.

agentscar · Post by **agentscar** » 2008-06-19 17:03

oh,oh,ok,lol.

Thanks for clearing that up for me,lol.

moj · Post by **moj** » 2008-06-20 00:14

Napoleon_TR wrote:I thing MEC use Hk-33 (better than g3) Here

or Hk416 Here

Hk Series Best (Only MEC forces)

I'd love to see the HK33 used as the standard MEC rifle, and HK23 for their automatic rifleman. As for the M4 though, I think it's great it's been implemented in the game for the US Army (with the 3-round burst). I just hope, that the M203 grenadier version will be fitted with an ACOG.

CodeSpartan · Post by **CodeSpartan** » 2008-06-20 03:36

moj wrote:I'd love to see the HK33 used as the standard MEC rifle, and HK23 for their automatic rifleman. As for the M4 though, I think it's great it's been implemented in the game for the US Army (with the 3-round burst). I just hope, that the M203 grenadier version will be fitted with an ACOG.

Hey, don't you touch my HK21.

Maxfragg · Post by **Maxfragg** » 2008-06-20 07:37

the HK33 will never replace the G3, but for one kit, it would be nice (rifleman unscoped)

US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Re: US Army Update Part 1