[Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

dbzao
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9381
Joined: 2006-06-08 19:13

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by dbzao »

good days... good days...
pclipse_teh_owner
Posts: 440
Joined: 2008-01-20 15:07

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by pclipse_teh_owner »

mp5punk wrote:wait what does this stuff do?

It's a changelog....meaning it shows what the DEVs changed from .8 - .85...jeez man.
Image
ExisSellos
Posts: 49
Joined: 2007-01-04 17:11

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by ExisSellos »

really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
Some like us most hate us

but they all fear us
Dude388
Posts: 404
Joined: 2008-07-21 21:15

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by Dude388 »

ExisSellos wrote:really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
I'm a Dude and I understand what's going on. ;)
Image
CodeRedFox
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 5919
Joined: 2005-11-08 00:47

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by CodeRedFox »

OH my god your right he forgot to decode it for you. DB you know you need to hit decode before posting these things :roll: silly dude

General Dragosh wrote:wiiiiiiiii here we go again with the teasing :neutral:
Its not teasing if you figure it out ;-)
Last edited by CodeRedFox on 2009-01-01 21:33, edited 1 time in total.
Image
"apcs, like dogs can't look up" - Dr2B Rudd
marcoelnk
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1581
Joined: 2007-03-03 11:30

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by marcoelnk »

ExisSellos wrote:really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
... really really stupid ... you're right.
Image
CodeC.Seven
Posts: 303
Joined: 2007-11-24 01:57

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by CodeC.Seven »

no its gettin really wired....
-Sig removed-
Hitperson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6733
Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by Hitperson »

what do you expect??
Image
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
CodeC.Seven
Posts: 303
Joined: 2007-11-24 01:57

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by CodeC.Seven »

not this kind of "game" 3 times in a row... First time it was ok... Second i accept it again... But a third time... Where is the kick on that?
-Sig removed-
dbzao
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9381
Joined: 2006-06-08 19:13

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by dbzao »

Jonny wrote:MATERIAL: Updated wreck to only be destroyed by C4, Slams, Tank rounds, bombs, heavy machineguns. (dbzao)

Why HMGs?

If a HMG can destroy then why not 40mm nades, 30mm API/HEAT rounds, etc.

Surely you should have to go out of your little fort and deal with the wreck properly!

Maybe you decoded it wrong ;)
jbgeezer
Posts: 908
Joined: 2008-06-10 15:30

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by jbgeezer »

Sure hope he did.
Live by the sword, die by the sword...

Ingame:G-LockCobra
http://www.youtube.com/user/sotemot
Charity Case
Posts: 179
Joined: 2008-02-15 22:27

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by Charity Case »

Jonny wrote:MATERIAL: Updated wreck to only be destroyed by C4, Slams, Tank rounds, bombs, heavy machineguns. (dbzao)

Why HMGs?

If a HMG can destroy then why not 40mm nades, 30mm API/HEAT rounds, etc.

Surely you should have to go out of your little fort and deal with the wreck properly!
You decoded it wrong, Jonny. The word is "mxxxxxxs," so "machineguns" can't fit. "Missiles" is a better fit.
McBumLuv
Posts: 3563
Joined: 2008-08-31 02:48

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by McBumLuv »

Charity Case wrote:You decoded it wrong, Jonny. The word is "mxxxxxxs," so "machineguns" can't fit. "Missiles" is a better fit.
Now that'll make wrecks the hassle that they ought to be. I can imagine, that Militia tank on fools road would be as much of a pain on the bridge destroyed or alive.
Image

Image

Image
Fox_Naturalist
Posts: 26
Joined: 2008-02-03 22:00

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by Fox_Naturalist »

how many more builds do u guys think? Im guessing its between 1-3.
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by Scot »

Fox_Naturalist wrote:how many more builds do u guys think? Im guessing its between 1-3.
Well considering 0.85 isn't a patch, it's a new build, i would say from past guesses, .809 so I'll go with, 0.858 or 0.857.
Image
Wheeter
Posts: 152
Joined: 2007-12-25 08:24

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by Wheeter »

Scot wrote:Well considering 0.85 isn't a patch, it's a new build, i would say from past guesses, .809 so I'll go with, 0.858 or 0.857.
forgive me for asking but what do the numbers actually mean lol? :mrgreen:
RedAlertSF
Posts: 877
Joined: 2008-10-07 14:21

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by RedAlertSF »

They seem to mean the build number. Current 0.85 build is 0.85_3_. Though I always though they mean the month when the version was released. :o ops:
MrYellow
Posts: 48
Joined: 2008-09-17 08:49

Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build

Post by MrYellow »

So we have to have the details of the log hidden from us why exactly?

How am I to decide if I want to download it if I don't know what it contains?

-Ben
Locked

Return to “2008”