well if you plan on doing major gunfighting use a different kit, the sapper is mainly for ambushing, its not like every kit has a no. 4Negocromn wrote:Jeez... the sapper already had a bad weapon on 0.8 (SKS), now it's even worse!! That N.4 is a VERY slow pistol, and you have to be really lucky to kill anything with that.
But aside from that, the new changes are wonderful.
[Gameplay] Insurgency updates
-
- Posts: 598
- Joined: 2007-06-26 21:37
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
Make nukes, Not war
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 2009-01-20 02:05
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
are you guys gona put random spawn points back?
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: 2007-11-21 20:49
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
I found the SKS to be more accurate than the AK (as it should be) and fine for long range engagements. Close up firefights is where the AK shines over the SKS, since they both use the same round anyway.
The No.4 Enfield is fine for a bolt gun for insurgents, the sapper isn't supposed to be a close engagement fighter.
The No.4 Enfield is fine for a bolt gun for insurgents, the sapper isn't supposed to be a close engagement fighter.
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 5919
- Joined: 2005-11-08 00:47
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
NO, the random spawn points are gone....but maybe read about what we did instead. It makes allot more sense.oleg wrote:are you guys gona put random spawn points back?
"apcs, like dogs can't look up" - Dr2B Rudd
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: 2005-08-15 00:42
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
yea its brilliant now, and it actually came from a forum post, should find out who originally made the post they deserve some props
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: 2008-09-06 01:40
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
The Brits in ww2 did pretty wellNegocromn wrote:Jeez... the sapper already had a bad weapon on 0.8 (SKS), now it's even worse!! That N.4 is a VERY slow pistol, and you have to be really lucky to kill anything with that.
But aside from that, the new changes are wonderful.
And its a rifle not a pistol, i understand English is not your first language. Just helping you out mate.
[/img]
*14 sigs made for PR members Ingame name:supermannen6 Not making sigs anymore. Army life does not permit it! hah
*14 sigs made for PR members Ingame name:supermannen6 Not making sigs anymore. Army life does not permit it! hah
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: 2008-09-20 16:07
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
wow this looks amazing, great job!
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 2008-12-18 15:12
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
Is it me or are you being sarcastic over my sarcasm?shifty66 wrote:The Brits in ww2 did pretty well
And its a rifle not a pistol, i understand English is not your first language. Just helping you out mate.
And about the ww2 talk, I'm talking about the weapon ingame, a bolt action rifle that doesn't comes even close to killing someone with a shot in the chest = useless.
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: 2007-11-21 20:49
Re: [Gameplay] Insurgency
I believe there was a post by a dev sometime back that said that the enfield got the damage of an AK put on it by mistake instead of the higher damage.Negocromn wrote:Is it me or are you being sarcastic over my sarcasm?
And about the ww2 talk, I'm talking about the weapon ingame, a bolt action rifle that doesn't comes even close to killing someone with a shot in the chest = useless.
Really an enfield should be like shooting a PKM slowly as the rounds have similar ballistics.
Even from high power rounds at range, the newer body armors can stop them if they are shot in the chest around the trauma plate.
YouTube - U.S. Soldier Shot by Iraqi Sniper