Project Reality Forums

Imho the British should get the Milan - we used to use it, but now we just use the Javelin (not the TOW) so it would be more realistic.

Source on Javelin: Javelin anti-tank weapon - British Army Website

Javelin, the medium range anti-tank guided weapon replacement for Milan,

Once you have the Javelin all other AT because irrelevant

Exite the supremacy of the armoured vehicles ^^.

is there the usual limited perimeter around the FOB like 50m to deploy or will it change?

I especially like the hud. Looks like you give them the sour face before you blow them up.

sooooo lookin forward to this

very nice, glad you guys listened to the community and added this

well now all we need are mortar pits, AGL position and wall of sandbags. and i think we will have a great selection.

great work to the team on this one. i can only just start to think how this is going to change some of my most loved maps.

The most usefull emplacement came last

I'm so looking forward to seeing what effects this will have on armoured warfare! But one more thing, will the AT weapons get realistic sight pcitures? The one's currently ingame are vbf2 unrealistic stuff, take for example the TOW. It's sight looks like you're looking through a pair of binoculars, while the real life TOW has a missile sight which looks like a sniper rifle's crosshair.

jbgeezer wrote:The most usefull emplacement came last

I'm so looking forward to seeing what effects this will have on armoured warfare! But one more thing, will the AT weapons get realistic sight pcitures? The one's currently ingame are vbf2 unrealistic stuff, take for example the TOW. It's sight looks like you're looking through a pair of binoculars, while the real life TOW has a missile sight which looks like a sniper rifle's crosshair.

See Combined Arms.

looking good we've been needin this for a while

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote: The TOW missile will be used by the US Army, USMC and the British ingame as there deployable Anti-Tank weapon.

hate to do this, but you used the wrong 'their' sry, it's just my pet peeve

looks great rhino! Ive always wanted to see these in the game!!!

Is there a limit to how many different deployable assets we can have apart from filling up the screen with a list of options?

Anglomanii mentioned mortars, which have already been modeled and could be a useful light fire support asset.

I think foxholes already fulfill the role of sandbags, but hesco sangars would be better. Also Hesco barriers with razor wire on top should replace the current tank traps. Then they'd look more like forward operating bases.

Snazz wrote: I think foxholes already fulfill the role of sandbags, but hesco sangars would be better. Also Hesco barriers with razor wire on top should replace the current tank traps. Then they'd look more like forward operating bases.

hesco barriers need a long time presence in an area to setup, the FB is a firebase and therefore a meeting point for the team.

it is not a build up compound like a FOB. hesco barriers would be unrealistic in regards to the FB setup that we use (these things are heavy as F&#¤)

[R-DEV]motherdear wrote:hesco barriers need a long time presence in an area to setup, the FB is a firebase and therefore a meeting point for the team.

it is not a build up compound like a FOB. hesco barriers would be unrealistic in regards to the FB setup that we use (these things are heavy as F&#¤)

Fair enough.

A Sandbox-mod-style, 'build a fort' CnC mode with hesco barriers and sangars would be pretty awesome though.

I hope they add that you can't make that beyond 50m from fob, otherwise this will be too powerful tool.

So, i guess 2 hats, and 6 lats aren't enough to handle armour? This really is going to unbalance the game, armour already has so much to worry about. Take Kashan for example, Infantry can Laze them and a Jet will fly over and shoot a missile at it. They can request armour support, or shoot it with one of their own hats.

ViktorMk wrote:So, i guess 2 hats, and 6 lats aren't enough to handle armour? This really is going to unbalance the game, armour already has so much to worry about. Take Kashan for example, Infantry can Laze them and a Jet will fly over and shoot a missile at it. They can request armour support, or shoot it with one of their own hats.

HATs and LATs need to be on the font lines with the Infantry. Not sitting at a FB just waiting around... thats why they are MOBILE at compared to stationary.

JM/Maukka wrote:I hope they add that you can't make that beyond 50m from fob, otherwise this will be too powerful tool.

if you can see a tank from a fob at inside 50m you sir are already dead or the armor is umanned



this is a good thing , it's about time

Finally!!! this will help so much

Maybe armour crews would benefit with a sniper to shoot the TOW users!