[Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Redfox · Post by **Redfox** » 2009-11-21 21:16

We are finally back with big update

here are our versions of final SA-58
3617 tris

4670 tris

4680 tris

5394 tris

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2009-11-21 21:34

looks sweet

Are you guys gonna use the double mag?

Anhkhoa · Post by **Anhkhoa** » 2009-11-21 21:34

You could use some smoothing groups on the end of the flash hider & trigger.

Also, your going to need the ironsight grenadier ( but I'm sure you know that).

Tri-count?

Redfox · Post by **Redfox** » 2009-11-21 21:49

Added tri count + yes we want to use double mag if there will be some way to do it

Teek · Post by **Teek** » 2009-11-21 22:20

the vBF2 AK-101 has a double mag reload animation, its kinda silly cause you just spin it around every time, but it should work for this beast.

Post by **Hauteclocque** » 2009-11-21 22:27

Damn, even the tri count is good !

Is the double mag common in CAF ?

Redfox · Post by **Redfox** » 2009-11-21 23:06

Yes Haute, dunno why but our soldiers love it

and for sure I love it too

Teek thx I will look on it and try to do something with it

maybe it will help us

Post by **Tim270** » 2009-11-21 23:24

The smoothing looks a little off on the grip. Other than that it looks nice, but as others have said, it can only have 1 reload animation and therefore the double mag just goes on contentiously and looks a bit odd.

WilsonPL · Post by **WilsonPL** » 2009-11-22 10:58

GL is not m203,

Are you sure there is no folding GL sight somewhere?

Redfox · Post by **Redfox** » 2009-11-22 11:55

well its normal to have that version with grenadelauncher without sight. But Im curious why too. Just look here:

Btw Eri it would be really nice if we can use your model of m203

its really not late we can everytime edit anything and yours is much more better then our

Post by **Chuc** » 2009-11-22 12:32

Yknow you guys are allowed and are encouraged to use PR's M203 asset, to cut down on needlessly recreating assets we already have.

WilsonPL · Post by **WilsonPL** » 2009-11-22 12:45

^ Is this version of VZ58 is in use by regular troops of Czech Army?

Post by **Hauteclocque** » 2009-11-22 12:46

Oh we know that Chuc.
The problem is that the model used by French Forces , Brazilian Forces and CAF forces is quite different to PR one, the model is shorter and when you put a normal M203 on the rifles used by that forces, it doesn't suit at all.

Nevermind, we (French Forces) will not use the M203 but the rifle grenades.( hum, animation Master required :mrgreen

We have the M203 short model because before we were not sure about our choices and we are OK to share it now with other factions.
But I see no problems if the other factions use PR M203, if it fits well with their weapons.

That will surely save some space.

Snork_SVK · Post by **Snork_SVK** » 2009-11-22 12:49

WilsonPL: No, but most soldiers in intenational missions upgrade their weapons or leave it to the master gunsmith...
but weapon in the picture is an example of someone improvements...

I would like if you used the grenade launcher ... looks better. I just do not know how many tri-counts...

I just edited all the optics and the collimator to have more segments and are more rounded ...
Colimator version now 4940 thri-counts
version whit optic 5048 tri-counts

BadGuy · Post by **BadGuy** » 2010-03-18 09:24

WHOA NOW that is not an SA58 at all.

The correct name would be SA Vz58.

Well if the Cezchens had the The modern SA58 variant civilian FAL then that's fine.

But the flash tip is expanding you from the barrel which every rifle firearm does not do, every rifle keeps the barrel and flash hider separate and are not fused.

1_Pablos_6 · Post by **1_Pablos_6** » 2010-03-21 16:14

What is your point here, BadGuy ? Can you elaborate ? SA-58 is a perfectly correct designation for this weapon. "Vz." can be interpreted as "Mk" in english (than accordingly: SA Mk.58 ), so SA-58 is sufficient. Let's not nitpicking, please... Also who exactly are "the Cezchens" yow were referring to ?

BroCop · Post by **BroCop** » 2010-03-21 16:43

Oh just ignore him...next thing we know he will use airsoft designations

*alternative version: This dude is a troll.

GeorgRavioli · Post by **GeorgRavioli** » 2010-04-09 01:13

BadGuy wrote:WHOA NOW that is not an SA58 at all.

The correct name would be SA Vz58.

Well if the Cezchens had the The modern SA58 variant civilian FAL then that's fine.

But the flash tip is expanding you from the barrel which every rifle firearm does not do, every rifle keeps the barrel and flash hider separate and are not fused.

Wow... I just looked up SA58 on Google Images. IT'S AN AIRSOFT GUN. The common designation is SA 58 because its short for Samopal vzor 1958.

SA58 - Google Search

Lol CroCop he already is using Airsoft Designations.

[Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

[Weapon] SA-58 99%, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS

Re: [Weapon] SA-58 FINAL, ALL VERSIONS