PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 2008-05-01 02:46
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I do support PRVs incorperation into PR, to keep the community together, but I will not be looking forward to the large download size.
-
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: 2008-04-14 17:37
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I hope it will be incorporated into the main build, so servers can switch between the 2 versions simply by changing maps. Most modern connections can stomach to download 4 gigs or more. If it takes you like a couple of hours, well you really cant wait 2-6 hours to play the mod, after you waited months and weeks for the update ? Really ?
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 2009-09-02 16:12
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
DL is usually the worst! I may have to delete BF2 to make room for PR and PRV.. lol jk
But yea aslong as I get a DL site up when released im fine
But yea aslong as I get a DL site up when released im fine
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 2009-02-08 22:27
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I might convert to strictly PR:V. I loved BF:V but i lost my disks :/
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: 2008-01-10 19:51
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
Delete the "C:/WINDOWS" folder, you don't need it!flyboy_fx wrote:DL is usually the worst! I may have to delete BF2 to make room for PR and PRV..
-
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: 2007-11-17 01:12
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I would say add it into the normal PR:bf2 cuz it would mean more players.
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 2009-09-02 16:12
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
WOOT![R-CON]Exec wrote:Delete the "C:/WINDOWS" folder, you don't need it!
WTF IS INTERNAL SYSTEM ERROR! HELP ME BEFORE IT IS TO LA.....lol jk
On topic..
Now.. What kinda loading music do we get? I chose real classic. vietnam era songs.. what do ya say? IS that what we will be getting?
-
- Posts: 260
- Joined: 2008-02-17 20:32
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
Operation Irving
PR:V Game Footage - Xfire Video
PR:V Game Footage - Xfire Video
-
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: 2006-12-23 02:45
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
ooh, a Chickasaw, I kinda dislike that aircraft, but I cant wait to be a gunner in one!jozi02 wrote:Operation Irving
PR:V Game Footage - Xfire Video
"Get some! yeah, get some! "
-
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: 2007-05-29 14:10
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
Its a H-34 choctaw actually
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: 2008-03-08 12:28
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I would say dont add it into the normal PR:BF2 cause it would mean less players.ma21212 wrote:I would say add it into the normal PR:bf2 cuz it would mean more players.
No offense TrahnLee but I doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam and DL a huge *** file (i believe the downloading will pretty much turn down most of the people)
-
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 17093
- Joined: 2007-02-08 07:19
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
We're still discussing it.
However, the argument of "i doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam" doesn't hold, as people also have their preferences within PR, for example not liking Insurgency, or play as Brits, etc.
But as said, we're still discussing it. Personally, I don't mind, I'll play PR:V one way or another .
However, the argument of "i doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam" doesn't hold, as people also have their preferences within PR, for example not liking Insurgency, or play as Brits, etc.
But as said, we're still discussing it. Personally, I don't mind, I'll play PR:V one way or another .
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: 2008-03-08 12:28
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
Wasnt really an argument it was more an expression of opinion (and as we all know opinion cant be valid/invalid, however it can be ignored )[R-DEV]AfterDune wrote:
However, the argument of "i doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam" doesn't hold, as people also have their preferences within PR, for example not liking Insurgency, or play as Brits, etc.
-
- Posts: 1159
- Joined: 2009-11-23 21:58
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I don't think it would mean a different download for PR:V if it would be incorporated with PR,CroCop wrote:I would say dont add it into the normal PR:BF2 cause it would mean less players.
No offense TrahnLee but I doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam and DL a huge *** file (i believe the downloading will pretty much turn down most of the people)
and I don't think that many players will switch if they find a vietnam map in the servers map rotation
-
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: 2009-02-11 08:00
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I expect 'most people' will happily accept a larger file size for a significant increase in new content and for the sake of keeping the community together.CroCop wrote:dont add it into the normal PR:BF2 cause it would mean less players. I doubt every PR player would want to play Vietnam and DL a huge *** file (i believe the downloading will pretty much turn down most of the people)
Tranhlee said if it was incorporated the core PR:V files would only be around 500mb, which seems little to me compared to the total file size of PR. More old maps can also be removed/packed separately if needed to keep down the level file size.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: 2009-03-22 01:01
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I would like it very much, especially for the smaller communities like Australia where we only pull off 1 full server a night, it would be a great shame to have to split that up and have say 40 on PR and 20 on PR:V.
-
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: 2009-03-22 13:06
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
just make it a game mode so like insurgency it says veitnam or something along those lines. or maybe have different selections on the main menu
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: 2008-03-25 09:43
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I would say incorporate it into PR main build, but release the 'Nam map pack as a separate object, like "Levels Part 3 - Vietnam' or sth. This would give an opportunity for players that are not "hype'd" about 'Nam to either DL it or not, but will still keep the community together.
-
- Posts: 4210
- Joined: 2008-07-22 15:04
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
I would really like to have it integrated so only the servers would change the maplists...
Easier for us players too, and you can use this menu allready as it doesnt matter
Easier for us players too, and you can use this menu allready as it doesnt matter
Orgies beat masturbation hands down. - Staker
-
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: 2007-11-22 03:06
Re: PR:V's Incoporation into Main Build
So when a server like -Cough- TG -Cough- switches to a vietnam map, you suddendly crash out of the server because you lack the map? Mkay... :Aquiller wrote:I would say incorporate it into PR main build, but release the 'Nam map pack as a separate object, like "Levels Part 3 - Vietnam' or sth. This would give an opportunity for players that are not "hype'd" about 'Nam to either DL it or not, but will still keep the community together.
«Hollywood jackasses who insist on spending seriously huge amounts of money to make films that even my cat won't watch. And he'll happily sit in the bathroom and watch me shit.»
- [R-DEV]Masaq
- [R-DEV]Masaq