US Army Update Part 1

Project Reality announcements and development highlights.
Locked
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Jaymz »

Hauler wrote: Also will there be fixes for some problems?
As in bug fixes? Yeah, tons actually. Hopefully we'll fix more problems than we cause this time :crazy:
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
Cyrax-Sektor
Posts: 1030
Joined: 2007-10-15 21:12

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Cyrax-Sektor »

That digital camo looks great! :D Really exciting news
hx.bjoffe
Posts: 1062
Joined: 2007-02-26 15:05

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by hx.bjoffe »

Hadn't you allready put the USI HMMWV in Kyongan 'Ni some short lapse of time?
Stryker and M4 looks kick ***.
Cool update.
billdan
Posts: 319
Joined: 2007-04-13 22:58

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by billdan »

hmm, most pics of frontline army infantry units ive seen have M4's with a vertical handgrip (if no m203) more often than not

no biggy though, great update
|TG-69th|Mix0lydian in-game
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Rhino »

hx.bjoffe wrote:Hadn't you allready put the USI HMMWV in Kyongan 'Ni some short lapse of time?
Stryker and M4 looks kick ***.
Cool update.
ye but that was only for a test build and we forgot to remove it :p

If you look at it how ever you will notice its 50.cal is 100% open.
Image
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by ReadMenace »

So uhh.. Appears the M68CCO is standard for the US Army rifleman... Awesome! *wonders if US Army SpecOps is going to get an M4 with ACOG* ;)

-REad
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Rhino »

the pics you see above with the M4 with a scope ingame are in fact the M4 with ACOG :p
Image
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by ReadMenace »

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:the pics you see above with the M4 with a scope ingame are in fact the M4 with ACOG :p
Indeed, under closer examination you are correct!
<3 Rhino

-REad
[=TC=]nuetron
Posts: 358
Joined: 2007-06-20 08:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by [=TC=]nuetron »

VERY NICE!

But you should have just said a few words with a vague picture like DCon's:

"The SandSotrm is comming"

You should have shown the ARMY logo and a blury soldier running through it saying,
"Project Reality strong" :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

I like the Army, but I am going to join the Marines, if only the Army had jets.....*sigh* O well.

Is the A-10 still going to be there? Because that would suck to ruin the whole map by taking out the CAS aircraft just because the forces switch..Also, it says Air Force on the pilot helmets. 8)
"There is no such thing as WAR-FAIR" -me
Fluffywuffy
Posts: 2532
Joined: 2007-11-13 23:52

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Fluffywuffy »

'[=TC= wrote:nuetron;695600']VERY NICE!

But you should have just said a few words with a vague picture like DCon's:

"The SandSotrm is comming"

You should have shown the ARMY logo and a blury soldier running through it saying,
"Project Reality strong" :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

I like the Army, but I am going to join the Marines, if only the Army had jets.....*sigh* O well.

Is the A-10 still going to be there? Because that would suck to ruin the whole map by taking out the CAS aircraft just because the forces switch..Also, it says Air Force on the pilot helmets. 8)
Good Luck with that.
They split flight classes in two
Navigator School
Pilot School or something like that name.

My dad got put into Nav. School.
He then became a Electronic Warfare Officer in the B-52s.

But that was the USAF
<--------------------------------------------------------->

Anyway Nice update. Skins nice. Stryker Awesome. Can't wait to see the Bradley.
jaspercat444
Posts: 599
Joined: 2007-12-19 06:11

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by jaspercat444 »

Finally! I can now spawn with an M4! Thank you... So much.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Rhino »

'[=TC= wrote:nuetron;695600']VERY NICE!

But you should have just said a few words with a vague picture like DCon's:

"The SandSotrm is comming"
DC / DCon is based on the gulf war, PR is not, hence why "sandstorm" is appropriate to them and not for us :roll:
Image
rangedReCon
Posts: 880
Joined: 2007-05-28 04:14

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by rangedReCon »

Great update, mucho love for all involved! :)
[img][IMG]http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z120/rangedReCon/12303-willbomb.gif[/img][/IMG]
Ironcomatose
Posts: 3471
Joined: 2007-02-21 06:07

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Ironcomatose »

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:DC / DCon is based on the gulf war, PR is not, hence why "sandstorm" is appropriate to them and not for us :roll:
He was using it as an example :roll:

[R-DEV]DuneHunter - No offense to any female gamers, but never, ever underestimate the amount of havoc a woman can unleash upon innocent unsuspecting electronics.
Fluffywuffy
Posts: 2532
Joined: 2007-11-13 23:52

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Fluffywuffy »

ironcomatose wrote:He was using it as an example :roll:
Though I do wish he'd put more thought and research in his suggestions.
Ironcomatose
Posts: 3471
Joined: 2007-02-21 06:07

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Ironcomatose »

Feuerwaffen wrote:Though I do wish he'd put more thought and research in his suggestions.
I dont agree with the suggestion because the more info we get the better( :) ) but i get what he is saying and i dont see anything wrong with it. Its just a different way to advertise. Kinda like the first Batman ads(Why so sad?) without any real info or pics. Thats what he meant.

[R-DEV]DuneHunter - No offense to any female gamers, but never, ever underestimate the amount of havoc a woman can unleash upon innocent unsuspecting electronics.
Eddie Baker
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00

Post by Eddie Baker »

Gunwing wrote:As well as the M1A2 Bradly with side and rear mounted M16A3s for the crew.
The M2 Bradley stopped having side firing ports with the M2A2. It now only has two rear firing port weapons which are aimed by tracers.

The M6 Bradley Linebacker was withdrawn from service a few years ago and they have been converted back into M2A2 and A3 Bradley IFVs.

The Mk-12 is finding a home in conventional US Marine rifle squads. As their squad level DMR, the Army just uses modified M4s/M16A4s, M14s, or just regular M4/M16 series weapons fitted with an ACOG and a bipod.
Last edited by Eddie Baker on 2008-06-09 03:16, edited 3 times in total.
Fluffywuffy
Posts: 2532
Joined: 2007-11-13 23:52

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Fluffywuffy »

ironcomatose wrote:I dont agree with the suggestion because the more info we get the better( :) ) but i get what he is saying and i dont see anything wrong with it. Its just a different way to advertise. Kinda like the first Batman ads(Why so sad?) without any real info or pics. Thats what he meant.
Just don't like getting threads of retired airplanes.

Zomg F-117!!!!11111
<------------------------------------------->

I got a title thingy!

"Project Reality..... The Enemy is coming and this time you can't just ban em'"
Ironcomatose
Posts: 3471
Joined: 2007-02-21 06:07

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Ironcomatose »


[R-DEV]DuneHunter - No offense to any female gamers, but never, ever underestimate the amount of havoc a woman can unleash upon innocent unsuspecting electronics.
Fluffywuffy
Posts: 2532
Joined: 2007-11-13 23:52

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Fluffywuffy »

ironcomatose wrote:I was wondering, whats up with the color of the Stryker? Isnt it supposed to be green?


http://www.mainandcentral.org/home/main ... ats_lg.jpg

http://www.army-technology.com/projects ... yker_6.jpg

http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/file ... z-iraq.jpg
Good Point, Did google search and saw no Tan/Brown paint
Locked

Return to “Announcements & Highlights”